2017
DOI: 10.4236/ojer.2017.64010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Precursors to the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes

Abstract: The Kumamoto area of Kyusyu Island was attacked by a series of large earthquakes (EQs) in April, 2016. The first two foreshocks had the magnitudes of 6.5 and 6.4, and about 1 day later there was the main shock on 15 April (UT) with magnitude 7.3. These are fault-type EQs, and so we would expect a variety of electromagnetic precursors to these EQs because we had detected different phenomena for the 1995 Kobe EQ, same fault-type EQ. As for the lithospheric effect, the ULF data at Kanoya observatory (about 150 km… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the area of Kumamoto where the medium-term EQ prediction indicates that the probability of having M7 class EQs in the coming 30 years is about 1%, there are available only few observations as related to the above lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling. Schekotov et al (2017) [48] have summarized different electromagnetic effects for this Kumamoto EQ, but no information on radon and crustal changes has been reported up to now. Our future work will be the coordination of different (electromagnetic, mechanical and chemical) data in order to go into details of generation mechanism of the ionospheric perturbation for the 2016 Kumamoto EQ event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the area of Kumamoto where the medium-term EQ prediction indicates that the probability of having M7 class EQs in the coming 30 years is about 1%, there are available only few observations as related to the above lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling. Schekotov et al (2017) [48] have summarized different electromagnetic effects for this Kumamoto EQ, but no information on radon and crustal changes has been reported up to now. Our future work will be the coordination of different (electromagnetic, mechanical and chemical) data in order to go into details of generation mechanism of the ionospheric perturbation for the 2016 Kumamoto EQ event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…All of those are caused by strike-slip faults (Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), 2016a). Some precursors of this EQ series have been reported, including the anomalies of foreshock activity (Kato et al, 2016), groundwater (Sano et al, 2016), ultralow frequency/extremely low frequency magnetic field (Potirakis, Schekotov, et al, 2018;Schekotov et al, 2017), VLF/LF propagation (Potirakis, Asano, et al, 2018), and total electron contents (Iwata & Umeno, 2017).…”
Section: Eq Treated In This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, it is worthwhile to investigate the EM phenomena for these Kumamoto events. A variety of different ionosphere-related precursory signatures possibly related to the Kumamoto EQs have already been reported, such as ionospheric anomalies as detected by total electron content (TEC) calculated by GNSS receivers [ 23 ], or GIM-TEC [ 24 ], or GPS-TEC [ 25 ], transient variations on atmospheric and ionospheric parameters [ 26 , 27 ], subionospheric very low frequency (VLF) propagation anomalies [ 28 , 29 ], atmospheric ULF/ELF radiation and ULF depression [ 30 ], criticality in the ground-observed ULF magnetic fields [ 31 ], and intermittency-induced criticality in the VLF subionospheric propagation data [ 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%