2013
DOI: 10.1587/transcom.e96.b.2340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Modeling of Metamaterials

Abstract: SUMMARYMetamaterials are generally defined as a class of artificial effective media which macroscopically exhibit extraordinary electromagnetic properties that may not be found in nature, and are composed of periodically structured dielectric, or magnetic, or metallic materials. This paper reviews recently developed electromagnetic modeling methods of metamatericals and their inherent basic ideas, with a focus on full wave numerical techniques. Methods described in this paper are the Method of Moments (MoM) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of using the complex electromagnetic field instead of the Hilbert transform is that it can handle a broader range of physical models in electromagnetic problems. For instance, the direct calculation of the complex electromagnetic field enables periodic structures illuminated by oblique incident waves to be modeled . In contrast, the Hilbert transform scheme cannot be applied for the optimization of such models because it does not generate a phasor representation of the solution at each time step, which is essential for the implementation of Floquet or periodic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage of using the complex electromagnetic field instead of the Hilbert transform is that it can handle a broader range of physical models in electromagnetic problems. For instance, the direct calculation of the complex electromagnetic field enables periodic structures illuminated by oblique incident waves to be modeled . In contrast, the Hilbert transform scheme cannot be applied for the optimization of such models because it does not generate a phasor representation of the solution at each time step, which is essential for the implementation of Floquet or periodic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, in the FDTD method, only the real part of the electromagnetic field is calculated. A direct extension for calculation of the complex field has also been formulated to model a periodic structure illuminated by oblique incident waves . These methods are called the Sine‐Cosine Method for single‐frequency problems, and Split‐Field FDTD method for broadband frequency problems.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical techniques contributed to simplify engineering models and solving them in an integrated solution using different techniques, including Simple Cavity Model, Wire Grid Model, and Green Function Method [16]. The Finite Difference Time Domain Method FDTD, Finite Difference Frequency Domain Method FDFD, Method of Moments MoM, and Finite Element Method FEM are example for numerical techniques use to solve field equations which are directly subject to imposed boundary constraints by the geometric structure [17]. The FDTD method has a prominent place among the numerical techniques that were used in electromagnetic analysis over the last two decades.…”
Section: Theoretical Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce calculation time, prediction methods have been applied to the FDTD method. One of the prediction methods is using the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model [5] to predict convergence values. It can reduce the calculation time of the FDTD analysis; the effectiveness of the ARMA model in the FDTD analysis has been verified [2,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the prediction methods is using the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model [5] to predict convergence values. It can reduce the calculation time of the FDTD analysis; the effectiveness of the ARMA model in the FDTD analysis has been verified [2,5]. However, the ARMA model has not been applied to FDTD radiation pattern analysis because the radiation patterns calculation requires multi-dimensional (time and space) data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%