2004
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2004.1072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Inversion of GPR Signals and Subsequent Hydrodynamic Inversion to Estimate Effective Vadose Zone Hydraulic Properties

Abstract: methods, intensive efforts have been undertaken to supplement the scarcity of hydrogeological data with densely We combine electromagnetic inversion of ground penetrating radar sampled geophysical data (Beres and Haeni, 1991; Ru-(GPR) signals with hydrodynamic inverse modeling to identify the effective soil hydraulic properties of a sand in laboratory conditions. bin et al., 1992; Hubbard et al., 1997; Hubbard and Ru-Ground penetrating radar provides soil moisture time series that are bin, 2000; Gloaguen et al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Waveform inversion methods can theoretically incorporate all the information present in the reflected waveform and thus may provide a tool to reliably and accurately quantify thinlayer parameters. Previous research has demonstrated the efficacy of this approach using GPR reflection data for a variety of subsurface problems, including detecting contaminant infiltration (Kalogeropoulos et al, 2013), measuring soil water content (Lambot et al, 2004;Tran et al, 2012), and quantifying subsurface ε ef and conductivity (σ) (Klotzsche et al, 2010;Busch et al, 2012). However, problems such as the coupled nature of material properties, computing speed, and solution nonuniqueness can hinder the reliability of full-waveform inversion algorithms (Operto et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waveform inversion methods can theoretically incorporate all the information present in the reflected waveform and thus may provide a tool to reliably and accurately quantify thinlayer parameters. Previous research has demonstrated the efficacy of this approach using GPR reflection data for a variety of subsurface problems, including detecting contaminant infiltration (Kalogeropoulos et al, 2013), measuring soil water content (Lambot et al, 2004;Tran et al, 2012), and quantifying subsurface ε ef and conductivity (σ) (Klotzsche et al, 2010;Busch et al, 2012). However, problems such as the coupled nature of material properties, computing speed, and solution nonuniqueness can hinder the reliability of full-waveform inversion algorithms (Operto et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4.9 summarises studies on the application of ground penetrating radar in predicting soil variables. The papers of Huisman et al (2003) and Lambot et al (2004) on prediction of soil moisture content might be interesting. Results of validation experiments were lacking, however.…”
Section: Ground Penetrating Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using borehole antennae, one can characterize the subsurface to a substantial depth but of course limited to the space close to borehole locations. By comparison, off-ground GPR data can be acquired on large areas with a high spatial resolution and using only the first reflection amplitude variations or the ground wave, the water content variations from the very near-surface can be estimated (Grote et al, 2003;Lambot et al, 2004a;Lambot et al, 2004b;Lambot et al, 2006). Also, in a quite electrically resistive medium like sand, with no magnetic properties, surface-based GPR data can have a penetration depth of at least 10 wavelengths of the sounding wave (typically 1.5 m of penetration using a 800 MHz antenna).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%