2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic interference caused by common surgical energy-based devices on an implanted cardiac defibrillator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not discussed in the scenario is the potential for electromagnetic interference with monopolar ESU and implanted devices, such as cardiac implanted electronic devices and nerve stimulators. Monopolar energy is associated with the improper firing of implanted electronic devices such as stimulators and cardiac defibrillators or pacemakers 10 . Clinicians should consider the use of bipolar or ultrasonic devices rather than monopolar devices to prevent interference with implanted devices 5,10 .…”
Section: Key Takeaways Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Not discussed in the scenario is the potential for electromagnetic interference with monopolar ESU and implanted devices, such as cardiac implanted electronic devices and nerve stimulators. Monopolar energy is associated with the improper firing of implanted electronic devices such as stimulators and cardiac defibrillators or pacemakers 10 . Clinicians should consider the use of bipolar or ultrasonic devices rather than monopolar devices to prevent interference with implanted devices 5,10 .…”
Section: Key Takeaways Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional precaution for the use of monopolar energy and an ESU dispersive pad is consideration of characteristics of the energy generated by the monopolar device. Monopolar energy will take the shortest direct route from the surgery site to the dispersive pad, so perioperative personnel must consider placing the pad in an area that does not permit the energy to cross over the leads, generator, or other conductive materials 10 …”
Section: Key Takeaways Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In bipolar electrosurgery, current flows between the two electrodes of the device, and the stray current is minimal [36,37]. If the monopolar device is necessary, the dispersion pad should be placed in the appropriate place closest to the surgical site, with the other magnetic devices outside the pathway [38].…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the monopolar circuitry and high voltage use, APC creates high risk EMI with the CIEDs. In a study that measured EMI of multiple energy-based devices on ICD, EMI from APC was measured at 2.58±0.34 mV and classified as "high risk" (37). Similar to electrocautery, EMI can result in inhibition of pacing, device reset, inappropriate shock or damage to the CIED circuitry.…”
Section: Argon Plasma Coagulation (Apc)mentioning
confidence: 99%