2014
DOI: 10.1021/nn502923s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Fields Mediate Efficient Cell Reprogramming into a Pluripotent State

Abstract: Life on Earth is constantly exposed to natural electromagnetic fields (EMFs), and it is generally accepted that EMFs may exert a variety of effects on biological systems. Particularly, extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (EL-EMFs) affect biological processes such as cell development and differentiation; however, the fundamental mechanisms by which EMFs influence these processes remain unclear. Here we show that EMF exposure induces epigenetic changes that promote efficient somatic cell reprogramming… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] Baek et al showed that extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field can replace Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc during reprogramming and enhance reprogramming efficiency. [19] Another recent study found that a grapheme-based substrate can enhance OSKM-induced reprogramming of MEFs by inducing the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) and epigenetic dynamics. [20] To date, few studies have investigated how substrate elasticity modulates the reprogramming of somatic cells into iPSCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] Baek et al showed that extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field can replace Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc during reprogramming and enhance reprogramming efficiency. [19] Another recent study found that a grapheme-based substrate can enhance OSKM-induced reprogramming of MEFs by inducing the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) and epigenetic dynamics. [20] To date, few studies have investigated how substrate elasticity modulates the reprogramming of somatic cells into iPSCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of ELF-MF exposure to destabilize epigenetic modifications in general and in a cancer-relevant manner has not been addressed systematically. Yet, it was reported to alter global levels of 5mC and the expression of DNA methyltransferases DNMT1 and DNMT3b in murine spermatocyte-derived cells31, and to increase the reprogramming efficiency of somatic cells by upregulation of the histone lysine methyltransferase Mll2, which appears to enrich H3K4me3 at pluripotency genes32.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These indicate that the surface modification by SiO 2 might retard this permeation process and lead to smaller Tet molecule density at the bottom surface and smaller scaling factor on the signal induction (see also Figure S2 19 ) although this modification can concentrate the tilted angle by 0. 3 and increase the mean free path by 2.4 lm.…”
Section: Physical Characteristics Of the "Wired" Signal Inductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, somatic cells can be reprogrammed to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by defined factors, 1 and 3D cultures can generate cells with stemlike properties in vitro. 2 In addition, external acting fields (e.g., electromagnetic fields 3 and infrared radiation 4 ) can affect cell development and differentiation as well, thanking the rapid and precise responding to signals from environments. In living systems, however, a perfect match between ligands/agonists and receptors may be questioned owing to the relatively low binding probability dominated by molecule collision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%