2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3295137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Field Effects in Explosives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion can be applied to the identification and identification of explosive composition. The closer the distance to the explosion center, the larger the frequency distribution range of the electromagnetic signal, and the electromagnetic frequency distribution in different directions is obviously different [23][24][25].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Frequency-domain Characteristics Of Electrom...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion can be applied to the identification and identification of explosive composition. The closer the distance to the explosion center, the larger the frequency distribution range of the electromagnetic signal, and the electromagnetic frequency distribution in different directions is obviously different [23][24][25].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Frequency-domain Characteristics Of Electrom...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies in this area have been conducted in the Los Alamos National Laboratory [19][20][21][22][23]. Nemzek [20] analyzed the relationship between the time at which the maximum low-frequency signal was measured and the shock wave propagation and speculated that the low-frequency signal was related to the plasma generated by detonation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that gaseous ejecta or plasma from detonating high explosives travel at 10 km/s in cylindrical shock tubes [1,[6][7][8] and can be focused in conical shock tubes to achieve impact velocities as high as 25 km/s (this work, framing camera studies). Heat fluxes projected onto target surfaces are estimated to be 1 to 10 GW/m 2 [9] and the damage to targets may be correlated with these thermal effects [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%