2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.101.205140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic coupling in tight-binding models for strongly correlated light and matter

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further note that the macroscopic QED framework, that is treating the material as a refractive index, also has its limitations. Complementary approaches connecting to electronic structure theory [123], quantum chemistry [124], and condensed matter physics [125] are available for a variety of parameter regimes and, while often being computationally demanding, allow to fully integrate associated effects.…”
Section: A Green's Function and Macroscopic Qedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further note that the macroscopic QED framework, that is treating the material as a refractive index, also has its limitations. Complementary approaches connecting to electronic structure theory [123], quantum chemistry [124], and condensed matter physics [125] are available for a variety of parameter regimes and, while often being computationally demanding, allow to fully integrate associated effects.…”
Section: A Green's Function and Macroscopic Qedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here μ l,i;l , j = l, i|D|l , j is the matrix element of the dipole moment operator for the (l , j) → (l, i) transition. Note that here we did not use the so-called multicenter Power-Zienau-Woolley transformation [48], which is appropriate for the more general case of a nonuniform electromagnetic field, and for which the Peierls phase [49] emerges in addition to the dipole interaction. It is also noteworthy that even though the gauge invariance would break down by a truncation of the full Hilbert space to a few lowest-energy bands, the difference between results obtained by using different gauges is only significant in the ultrastrong coupling regime, where the light-matter interaction is comparable in magnitude with the transition frequency of the system [50], as opposed to the typically weak-coupling regime of spectroscopic measurements under consideration.…”
Section: Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and k x (t ) = k x − A cos( t ) and k y (t ) = k y − A sin( t ). Here we used a minimal coupling procedure that is valid for nottoo-strong couplings to the electromagnetic field [86]. The vector potential enters in the same way near both the K and K points.…”
Section: Driven System In Free Spacementioning
confidence: 99%