2017
DOI: 10.3390/met8010012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrolytic Plasma Polishing of Pipe Inner Surfaces

Abstract: Smooth surfaces are becoming increasingly important in many industries, such as medical, chemical or food. In some industrial areas, the mechanical treatment of surfaces (grinding and polishing) does not fulfil desired specifications. Non-abrasive methods (chemical and electrochemical) have the advantage that even complex geometries and free-form shapes can be polished. In the context of this paper, electrochemical surface treatment is considered in more detail. Both electro polishing, which is state of the ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that increasing numbers of plasma polishing passages n lead to lower average surface roughnesses Sa v at constant velocities. On the other hand, the results also confirm the findings of the previous study [22], that lower velocities v lead to lower average roughnesses Sa v at constant numbers of plasma polishing passages n. Figure 3 depicts the average roughness Sa v depending on the number n of plasma polishing passages for the different velocities v and finally illustrates the derived basic relations. It can been learned from Table 1 and Figure 3 that the mean average surface roughnesses Sa v reach a range from 0.030 µm to 0.040 µm for the pipe inner surface after a certain number n of plasma polishing passages dependent on the chosen velocity v of the polishing passage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results show that increasing numbers of plasma polishing passages n lead to lower average surface roughnesses Sa v at constant velocities. On the other hand, the results also confirm the findings of the previous study [22], that lower velocities v lead to lower average roughnesses Sa v at constant numbers of plasma polishing passages n. Figure 3 depicts the average roughness Sa v depending on the number n of plasma polishing passages for the different velocities v and finally illustrates the derived basic relations. It can been learned from Table 1 and Figure 3 that the mean average surface roughnesses Sa v reach a range from 0.030 µm to 0.040 µm for the pipe inner surface after a certain number n of plasma polishing passages dependent on the chosen velocity v of the polishing passage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It can been learned from Table 1 and Figure 3 that the mean average surface roughnesses Sa v reach a range from 0.030 µm to 0.040 µm for the pipe inner surface after a certain number n of plasma polishing passages dependent on the chosen velocity v of the polishing passage. This means better polishing results can be achieved with optimized polishing parameters compared to the results found in the previous study [22]. It can also be recognized from Table 1 and Figure 3 that comparable average surface roughness Sa v can be achieved either at a high passage velocity combined with a high number of passages or a low passage velocity combined with a low number of passages.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations