2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(200004)27:3<358::aid-eat15>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrolyte and other blood serum abnormalities in normal weight bulimia nervosa: Evidence for sampling bias

Abstract: Objective Sampling bias due to research settings might be responsible for reported high prevalence rates of electrolyte and serum abnormalities in bulimia nervosa. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of electrolyte and other serum abnormalities in bulimia nervosa patients with normal weight seeking treatment in a community mental health center. Method Diagnostic evaluations and laboratory tests were done for a consecutive series of 31 patients meeting DSM‐III‐R criteria for bulimia nervosa.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mitchell et al 1983b). More recently, few and only minor (not clinically significant) abnormalities have been found (Peeters & Meijboom 2000). This may be due to differences in severity of patients-the latter study was conducted in a primary care rather than specialist setting.…”
Section: Electrolytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitchell et al 1983b). More recently, few and only minor (not clinically significant) abnormalities have been found (Peeters & Meijboom 2000). This may be due to differences in severity of patients-the latter study was conducted in a primary care rather than specialist setting.…”
Section: Electrolytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on potassium levels in such patients is comprehensive, yet confusing and sometimes contradictory. The proportion of bulimic patients with hypokalemia ranged in various studies from 0 to 18% (Mitchell, Pyle, Eckert, Hatsukami, & Lentz, 1983;Jacobs & Schneider, 1985;Mira, Stewart, Vizzard, & Abraham, 1987;Greenfeld, Mickley, Quinlan, & Roloff, 1995;Biebl & Kinzl, 1996;Crow, Salisbury, Crosby, & Mitchell, 1997;Peeters & Meijboom, 2000;Wolfe, Metzger, Levine, & Jimerson, 2001) and the proportion of patients with anorexia nervosa and hypokalemia from 0 to 100% (Wolff et al, 1968;Warren & Steinberg, 1979;Koh et al, 1989;Greenfeld et al, 1995;Biebl & Kinzl, 1996;Crow et al, 1997). Revisions made to various diagnostic systems also mean that the patient groups included in earlier studies are no longer really comparable to those in more recent ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%