2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2006.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrolarynx in voice rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are currently limited options to assist speech communication for those individuals (e.g., esophageal speech, tracheo-esophageal speech or tracheo-esophageal puncture (TEP) speech, and electrolarynx). These approaches, however, produce an abnormal sounding voice [17,18], which impacts the quality of life of laryngectomees. Current text-to-speech technologies have been able to produce speech with natural sounding voice for SSIs [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are currently limited options to assist speech communication for those individuals (e.g., esophageal speech, tracheo-esophageal speech or tracheo-esophageal puncture (TEP) speech, and electrolarynx). These approaches, however, produce an abnormal sounding voice [17,18], which impacts the quality of life of laryngectomees. Current text-to-speech technologies have been able to produce speech with natural sounding voice for SSIs [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are currently only a limited number of post-laryngectomy voice restoration methods available for these individuals: esophageal speech, the electrolarynx and speech valves. Unfortunately, these methods are often limited by their usability and/or the abnormal voice produced, which may be hard to understand for listeners [1,[3][4]. On the other hand, typing-based augmented and alternative communication (AAC) devices are limited by slow manual text input [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, about 12,260 new cases of laryngeal cancer were estimated in the United States (American Cancer Society, 2013). Currently, there are only limited treatment options for these individuals including (1) esophageal speech, which involves oscillation of the esophagus and is difficult to learn; (2) tracheo-esophageal speech, in which a voice prosthesis is placed in a tracheo-esophageal puncture; and (3) electrolarynx, an external device held on the neck during articulation, which produces a robotic voice quality (Liu and Ng, 2007). Perhaps the greatest disadvantage of these approaches is that they produce abnormal sounding speech with a fundamental frequency that is low and limited in range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the greatest disadvantage of these approaches is that they produce abnormal sounding speech with a fundamental frequency that is low and limited in range. The abnormal voice quality output severely affects the social life of people after laryngectomy (Liu and Ng, 2007). In addition, the tracheo-esophageal option requires an additional surgery, which is not suitable for every patient (Bailey et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%