2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2022.102600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrokinetic behavior of artificial and natural calcites: A review of experimental measurements and surface complexation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 182 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4-5, without considering the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the surface. Also, it was considered uniform and constant despite being space-dependent [49]. With these assumptions, they can be used for a comparative purpose when the same brine is used.…”
Section: Calculation Of Zeta Potential From Streaming Potential Measu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4-5, without considering the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the surface. Also, it was considered uniform and constant despite being space-dependent [49]. With these assumptions, they can be used for a comparative purpose when the same brine is used.…”
Section: Calculation Of Zeta Potential From Streaming Potential Measu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, zeta potentials obtained for EST2 are less negative for SWd40 and SW-SO4 and more positive for FMB than those obtained for EST1. This variation can be related to differences in rock texture or the presence of impurities [49,55,56], as the calculated zeta potential represents a macroscopic weighted average that accounts for the magnitude and distribution of microscopic zeta potentials arising at each mineral surfaces (Figure 7). It can also be related to the difference in the composition of the solutions after interaction with the intact sample, as some variations in pH, conductivity and viscosity were observed ( Table 4).…”
Section: Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigators have reported ζ-potential measurements of the rock–brine–oil system using a variety of techniques, including electrophoresis and streaming potential. Others have also predicted the ζ-potential using models. For instance, surface complexation model (SCM), a geochemical model that describes the molecular level interaction of ions with solid surfaces, has been used to explain the ionic interactions with rocks and oil at the molecular level. However, understanding of the rock–brine–oil interfacial characteristics (i.e., ζ-potential) has suffered from a lack of relevant models and measurements . Most of the literature studies used the diffused double-layer SCM, which does not capture the complexities at the rock–brine and oil–brine interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments have seen the application of the basic Stern and triple-layer SCM to model the geochemical reactions. These models assume ionic interactions at different parallel planes separated by a defined capacitance; ,,,, hence, they have been successfully applied in explaining the electrokinetic interactions at the rock–brine and oil–brine interfaces. Nonetheless, most of the SCMs predicted the ζ-potential using low-salinity brine and/or single-salt brine. ,,, However, naturally subsurface reservoirs contain high-salinity brine with multicomponent ionic composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this challenge, many experiments were designed to separately study the interactions in the brine–rock or oil–brine systems. The knowledge coming from these experiments is extremely valuable and essential for the development of surface complexation models (SCMs) for both the calcite–brine (e.g., refs ) and oil–brine interfaces . These SCMs, which describe and quantify the adsorption and charge development at both interfaces based on the brine and crude oil composition, are often used to assess the wetting conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%