1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01005968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrohydrodynamic mechanism of plasma ejection in radio pulsars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, however, two important alterations have been made to the theory. First, the importance of general relativistic frame dragging in the creation of the accelerating potential was discovered by Muslimov & Tsygan (1990, 1992 and later elaborated by Muslimov & Harding (1997). Second, several authors (Sturner, Dermer, & Michel 1995 ;Luo 1996 ;Zhang et al 1997) have suggested that inverse Compton scattering (ICS) is an important, perhaps the dominant, high-energy photon emission mechanism, rather than the curvature radiation proposed by the earlier theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, however, two important alterations have been made to the theory. First, the importance of general relativistic frame dragging in the creation of the accelerating potential was discovered by Muslimov & Tsygan (1990, 1992 and later elaborated by Muslimov & Harding (1997). Second, several authors (Sturner, Dermer, & Michel 1995 ;Luo 1996 ;Zhang et al 1997) have suggested that inverse Compton scattering (ICS) is an important, perhaps the dominant, high-energy photon emission mechanism, rather than the curvature radiation proposed by the earlier theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the potential, the PFF height sets the Ðnal Lorentz factor of the beam, determining the energy budget of the polar cap region. This paper calculates, in a direct analytic manner, and for an arbitrary pulsar, the height of the PFF in the presence of the Muslimov & Tsygan (1990, 1992 accelerating potential and including the e †ects of inverse Compton scattering. Qualitatively, two rates combine to position the PFF : the creation rate of photons capable of pair-producing and the rate at which those photons can pair-produce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The buoyancy force f B is of the order of H c 1 φ 0 /8π R ∼ 1.0 dyne cm −1 (Muslimov & Tsygan 1985; Jones 2006), where H c 1 is the superconductor lower critical field and R is the neutron‐star radius. This term can arise because the normal to superconducting transition is so fast that the superconductor is in a steady, but not necessarily complete equilibrium state.…”
Section: Application To Proton Vorticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tinkham 1996). Steady‐state motion of the proton vortices is determined by the balance of the Magnus force, electromagnetic interactions, external forces including buoyancy forces (Muslimov & Tsygan 1985; Jones 2006) and interaction with vortices of the rotating neutron superfluid (Muslimov & Tsygan 1985; Sauls 1989; Jones 1991; Ruderman, Zhu & Chen 1998), and forces derived from interactions between the quasi‐particles of the system. The distinct populations of superfluid quasi‐particles concerned are those localized in the cores of proton vortices and those delocalized in the continuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wind Accretion 10 −14 − 10 There is likely to be a strong inter-pinning between the proton fluxoids and the neutron vortices (Muslimov & Tsygan 1985a;Sauls 1989). In a spinning down neutron star the neutron vortices migrate outward and by virtue of inter-pinning drag the proton fluxoids along to the outer crust.…”
Section: Spin-down Induced Flux Expulsionmentioning
confidence: 99%