2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrogenerated chemiluminescence reactions between the [Ru(bpy)3]2+ complex and PAMAM GX.0 dendrimers in an aqueous medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results strongly suggest that the co‐reactant effect of the PAMAM dendrimers originates mostly from interior tertiary amines of the dendrimers. This is an interesting finding, since it was previously speculated that the terminal primary amine groups of the dendrimers are mainly responsible for the co‐reactant effect of the dendrimers, which is somewhat contrary to our observations . Additionally, we compared the co‐reactant effects of G4‐NH 2 and G4‐OH, which are amine‐terminated and hydroxyl‐terminated 4 th generation PAMAM dendrimers, respectively, for the ECL of [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results strongly suggest that the co‐reactant effect of the PAMAM dendrimers originates mostly from interior tertiary amines of the dendrimers. This is an interesting finding, since it was previously speculated that the terminal primary amine groups of the dendrimers are mainly responsible for the co‐reactant effect of the dendrimers, which is somewhat contrary to our observations . Additionally, we compared the co‐reactant effects of G4‐NH 2 and G4‐OH, which are amine‐terminated and hydroxyl‐terminated 4 th generation PAMAM dendrimers, respectively, for the ECL of [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Perez‐Tejeda et al. observed that PAMAM dendrimers (specifically, generation 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 4.0 and 4.5 dendrimers) behaved as co‐reactants for the generation of ECL with [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ . Indeed, as shown in Figure a, we also observed the co‐reactant effect of G n ‐NH 2 ( n =2, 4, and 6) dendrimers for the ECL of [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…ECL measurements (cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments plus ECL emissions) were carried out as in previous works. [47][48][49] All ECL measurements were recorded using the CV technique working at a scan rate of 100 mV s À1 . The uncertainty of the relative measured ECL efficiency (F ECL ) (see Section 3.1) was less than 4% from the average of two or three measurements in Scheme 1 Au@tiopronin/[Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ system.…”
Section: Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak potentials (E peak ) for the [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 3+/2+ couple in several AuNPs solutions were determined using the differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) technique, as in previous works. [47][48][49] The experimental conditions were identical with those corresponding to ECL measurements (vide supra).…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation