2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence Immunoassays on Nanoelectrode Ensembles Platform with Magnetic Microbeads for the Determination of Carbohydrate Antigen

Abstract: This work reports a gold nanoelectrode ensembles (Au-NEE) platform taken as a disposable electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) platform with immunomagnetic microbeads for ECL immunoassays for the first time. The peak-shaped voltammograms were obtained at the Au-NEE, attributed to the total diffusional overlap. The ECL intensity at Au-NEE was 12.9 folds in the Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -tri-n-propylamine (TPA) ECL system and 19.6 folds in the luminol-H 2 O 2 system, compared with that at the Au macroelectrode using the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, the oxidation of AuNPs was assumed to be responsible for this. As displayed in Figure S15, ECL signals of Ru­(bpy) 3 2+ /TPrA on Au were weaker than that on the GCE, which is in line with reports of Gai et al It may be attributed to the resonance energy transfer between Ru­(bpy) 3 2+ and AuNPs and oxidation of AuNPs . Au was reported to form chemisorbed incipient oxides, Au–O, at 0.6–0.7 V, and Au 2 O 3 was generated exclusively at potentials >1.13 V versus Ag/AgCl .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among them, the oxidation of AuNPs was assumed to be responsible for this. As displayed in Figure S15, ECL signals of Ru­(bpy) 3 2+ /TPrA on Au were weaker than that on the GCE, which is in line with reports of Gai et al It may be attributed to the resonance energy transfer between Ru­(bpy) 3 2+ and AuNPs and oxidation of AuNPs . Au was reported to form chemisorbed incipient oxides, Au–O, at 0.6–0.7 V, and Au 2 O 3 was generated exclusively at potentials >1.13 V versus Ag/AgCl .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As displayed in Figure S15, ECL signals of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ /TPrA on Au were weaker than that on the GCE, which is in line with reports of Gai et al 17 It may be attributed to the resonance energy transfer between Ru(bpy) 3 2+ and AuNPs 18 and oxidation of AuNPs. 19 Au was reported to form chemisorbed incipient oxides, Au−O, at 0.6−0.7 V, 20 and Au 2 O 3 was generated exclusively at potentials >1.13 V versus Ag/AgCl. 21 Also, AuCl 2 generated with Cl − leaked from the reference electrode, according to eq 1, 22 was also expected to involve in the redox reactions.…”
Section: Selection Of the Electrochemical Driving Mode For Ecl Ecl Si...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) is a process of light emission by means of a high-energy electron transfer reaction, which combines the superiorities of both chemiluminescence techniques and electrochemical methods. , Moreover, ECL does not require excitation light sources and theoretically without any background interference compared with fluorescence . Therefore, ECL has attracted extensive attention from researchers and developed as a powerful analytical technique for immunoassays, environmental monitoring, food safety, and other fields owing to simplified optical equipment, high sensitivity, and facile controllability. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) biosensing methods based on functional magnetic micro-beads (MBs) with a ruthenium complex (Ru­(bpy) 3 2+ ) as the signal reagent have been widely applied in clinical diagnosis for DNA and protein biomarkers since they are extremely sensitive at subpicomolar concentrations and have an extremely wide dynamic range and easy application coupled with an automated ECL analyzer. , However, most of reported ECL biosensing methods using MBs for the determination of proteins are on the basis of the immunoassay of antigen (target) binding with the antibody. Regarding the determination of proteases, there are usually two strategies, which can be mainly classified into a binding-based immunoassay and bio-cleavage-based bioassay. , In the immunoassay, the antibody as the recognition element is required. However, the antibody is obtained from the immunized animals and has difference between the batches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%