2008
DOI: 10.1021/la703391q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroformation of Giant Phospholipid Vesicles on a Silicon Substrate:  Advantages of Controllable Surface Properties

Abstract: We introduce the use of silicon (Si) as a substrate for the electroformation of giant phospholipid vesicles. By taking advantage of the tunability of silicon surface properties, we varied the organization of the phospholipid film on the electrode and studied the consequences on vesicle formation. In particular, we investigated the effects of Si surface chemistry and microtopology on the organization of the phospholipid film and the properties of the final vesicles. We established correlations between chemical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that the change of the diffusion mode occurred at approximately the main-phase transition temperature determined from the diffusion coefficients measured via z-scan FCS. Examination of the data for the glass-supported bilayers suggests similar results, with the change in the diffusion mode potentially occurring near the measured main-phase transition temperature of 24.3 C. However, the uncertainty of the data in the temperature range of [20][21][22][23][24] C prohibits any absolute statements about the diffusion behavior. Regardless, it is clear that there is a substrate-dependent difference in behavior in the [20][21][22][23][24] C temperature range when comparing the actin-supported and glass-supported bilayers.…”
Section: Biophysical Journal 108(8) 1946-1953supporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is noted that the change of the diffusion mode occurred at approximately the main-phase transition temperature determined from the diffusion coefficients measured via z-scan FCS. Examination of the data for the glass-supported bilayers suggests similar results, with the change in the diffusion mode potentially occurring near the measured main-phase transition temperature of 24.3 C. However, the uncertainty of the data in the temperature range of [20][21][22][23][24] C prohibits any absolute statements about the diffusion behavior. Regardless, it is clear that there is a substrate-dependent difference in behavior in the [20][21][22][23][24] C temperature range when comparing the actin-supported and glass-supported bilayers.…”
Section: Biophysical Journal 108(8) 1946-1953supporting
confidence: 51%
“…The diffusion coefficients for the glass-supported membranes (Fig. 3, triangles) also increased with temperature, but over a more narrow range (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) C). The main-phase transition temperature for each model membrane was determined via …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In electroformation where an AC field is used (Angelava & Dimitrov 1987;Constantin et al 2005;Lecuyer et al 2006;Le Berre et al 2008), the AC field frequency is several Hz, the AC strength E 0 is often a few kilovolts per metre, σ 1 ∼ 10 −4 S m −1 , the channel height is in the range 100 µm h 0 1 mm and the channel aspect ratio usually satisfies 0.3 for a vesicle filling the channel ( = 2r 0 /2πr 0 = 1/π ∼ 0.3). In our non-dimensionalization, this gives a time scale h 0 C m /σ 1 ∼ 10 −1 s. Thus the maximum growth rate from figure 3(b,c) (for a tensionless planar membrane in an AC field) gives an estimate of several seconds for significant membrane deformation due to linear instability, consistent with results in Seiwert & Vlahovska (2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confinement inside small channels in an environment that provides controlled mixing enables synthesis of liposomes in the submicron range. Thus, adapting the conventional macroscale processes such as electroformation [15], hydration [16], extrusion [5], and double emulsion technique [26] to microfluidic devices prevents the loss of reagents while achieving a tight control on the liposome size. Recent microfluidic approaches by Jahn et al [12] and modification of the same using membranes by Akamatsu et al [1] have enabled the synthesis of monodisperse liposomes in the submicron range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%