2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0an01939a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroenzymatic choline sensing at near the theoretical performance limit

Abstract: Using detailed simulations as a guide, an implantable, electroenzymatic choline sensor with sensitivity approaching the theoretical and unprecedented response time has been created.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming K = 2 × 10 7 L/mol, the performance of the present nanopore-based device for Ach detection at pH 7 is much better than that of other methods. For example, the detection limit of the present device is 1–10 nM, which is orders of magnitude lower than that of other methods: 0.34 μM by electroenzymatic choline sensing, 0.3 μM through polymeric membrane electrodes, and 0.01 μM by PAMAM-Sal dendrimer …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Assuming K = 2 × 10 7 L/mol, the performance of the present nanopore-based device for Ach detection at pH 7 is much better than that of other methods. For example, the detection limit of the present device is 1–10 nM, which is orders of magnitude lower than that of other methods: 0.34 μM by electroenzymatic choline sensing, 0.3 μM through polymeric membrane electrodes, and 0.01 μM by PAMAM-Sal dendrimer …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Unlike many applications of μCP for deposition of monolayer-thick patterns of protein, the goal here was to deposit a ∼4–5 μm-thick film corresponding to many equivalent enzyme layers on a well-defined microelectrode substrate in order to give optimal sensor performance. 24 The printing of a thick pattern with micron-scale, lateral spatial resolution is challenging; as it requires a good combination of surface wettability of the ink and ink viscosity (Fig. 6), since the chitosan film on the microelectrodes presents a hydrophilic surface for a water-based ink to wet and spread.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deviations from performance in vitro may even be more pronounced for sensors using different enzymes with slower kinetics, as differences in sensor response time are expected to have a large effect on the ability of simulated sensors to monitor quickly changing concentrations. 21 Within the context of the available sensing techniques, miniaturization of Glut sensors will be necessary (and is feasible considering recent sensitivity improvements) 15,40 if electroenzymatic sensing techniques are intended to operate with spatiotemporal resolution approaching that of devices for electrophysiological recordings, 41 which have resolved >250 Hz action potentials within ∼50 μm of a three-dimensional electrode array. 42 An approach to similar levels of spatiotemporal resolution with electroenzymatic sensors would provide exciting opportunities for simultaneous electrophysiological and electrochemical recordings and the correlation of chemical signaling with neuronal activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%