2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2014.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroencephalography as a post-stroke assessment method: An updated review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both beta ERS and ERD were reduced on average in minor stroke patients compared to controls, though only the ERS showed a significant difference. Prior studies have shown abnormal latencies, amplitudes and cortical patterns for both beta ERD and ERS in stroke patients with motor impairments (Eder et al, 2006;Monge-Pereira et al, 2017;Parkkonen et al, 2017;Platz et al, 2000;Tang et al, 2020). The beta ERD/ERS is thought to reflect regulation of intracortical inhibition (Takemi et al, 2013), although they may also arise from several other functions including motor planning and short-term memory (Kilavik et al, 2013).…”
Section: Reduced Beta Ers/erd In Patients Compared To Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both beta ERS and ERD were reduced on average in minor stroke patients compared to controls, though only the ERS showed a significant difference. Prior studies have shown abnormal latencies, amplitudes and cortical patterns for both beta ERD and ERS in stroke patients with motor impairments (Eder et al, 2006;Monge-Pereira et al, 2017;Parkkonen et al, 2017;Platz et al, 2000;Tang et al, 2020). The beta ERD/ERS is thought to reflect regulation of intracortical inhibition (Takemi et al, 2013), although they may also arise from several other functions including motor planning and short-term memory (Kilavik et al, 2013).…”
Section: Reduced Beta Ers/erd In Patients Compared To Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthesis of the MRCP literature is a challenge due to its diverse research objectives and the different terminologies used across various fields of research ( Jahanshahi and Hallett, 2003 ). Previous literature reviews have focused on the characteristics of the MRCP and their physiological implications ( Shibasaki and Hallett, 2006 ), the application of the MRCP to motor learning ( Wright et al, 2011 ), its use as a predictor of an upcoming movement ( Ahmadian et al, 2013 ; Shakeel et al, 2015 ), and its potential to assess outcomes following stroke ( Monge-Pereira et al, 2017 ). However, no reviews have specifically focused on understanding the MRCP during ecologically valid movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BCI training (BCIT) systems can use EEG signals from MI performance with sensory real-time feedback and decode these signals to enable patients to direct devices such as personal computers, wheelchairs, robots, and prosthetic devices including exoskeletons. Some studies have investigated the efficacy of applying BCIT using MI on motor recovery for patients with subacute or chronic stroke with hemiparesis [3,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Although these studies demonstrated a significant effect on recovery, the studies were flawed by low number of participants, low number of training sessions and/or a lack of follow-up assessments [3,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%