2015
DOI: 10.1080/24708593.2017.1291550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroencephalographic Changes After Application of Dry Needling [DNHS© Technique] in Two Patients With Chronic Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are no studies that compare DN with BTX-A injection techniques, both could rely on similar mechanisms of action, namely, destroying dysfunctional motor plates and preventing the release of acetylcholine as a result of mechanical breaking in the case of needling [ 36 ] or chemical denervation in the case of BTX-A injections [ 37 ]. However, studies on BTX-A injections have not revealed significant changes in functionality [ 38 , 39 ], whereas the patient in this study experienced a decrease of 25% in the time spent to complete the 9HPT, which persisted for 4 days after the intervention, despite the fact that both BTX-A and DN seem to have central effects [ 15 , 16 , 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are no studies that compare DN with BTX-A injection techniques, both could rely on similar mechanisms of action, namely, destroying dysfunctional motor plates and preventing the release of acetylcholine as a result of mechanical breaking in the case of needling [ 36 ] or chemical denervation in the case of BTX-A injections [ 37 ]. However, studies on BTX-A injections have not revealed significant changes in functionality [ 38 , 39 ], whereas the patient in this study experienced a decrease of 25% in the time spent to complete the 9HPT, which persisted for 4 days after the intervention, despite the fact that both BTX-A and DN seem to have central effects [ 15 , 16 , 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although the mechanism of action of DN is still unclear, it is known that DN inhibits the H-reflex [ 12 ], decrease the frequency of motor unit spontaneous firing spikes [ 13 ] and may modify the contractile capacities of the spastic muscle [ 14 ]. Recent studies have also shown that DN achieves an increased activation of the sensory and motor areas in post-stroke [ 15 , 16 ]. Moreover, some experimental studies in animal models have shown that DN reduces the abnormal electromyographic (EMG) activity that is characteristic of MTrPs [ 17 ] and that an intact afferent pathway and normal spinal cord function are needed to evoke remote effects of dry needling on EMG endplate noise [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinician followed the published DNHS ® essential diagnostic criteria for patients with neurological impairments. 26 The DDN application was based on the DNHS ® technique. 12 The intensity of the application was adjusted according to the patients' tolerance.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stroke and cerebral palsy) is the dry needling technique (DNT). [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] DNT is a specialized intervention that uses a fine filiform needle to penetrate muscle directly at a myofascial trigger point (MTrP). 24 Nevertheless, reports are scarce regarding the potential effect of DNT in reducing spasticity in an incomplete SCI (iSCI), 25 and the effect on functionality is not yet described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesized relation between DNT and decreased spasticity is established in prior research reporting a decrease in noise at the dysfunctional endplate, 26,27 restoration of muscle architecture, 20 contractile properties, 17 and a positive effect on regional brain activity. 19 The MTrPs may be responsible for joint-range restrictions and alterations to muscle activation patterns. 28 Even a single session of DNT in the lower limbs could positively affect postural control, in addition to reducing spasticity 22,29 and pressure-pain sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%