2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/3109061
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroencephalogram Image under Complex Domain Analysis Algorithm to Analyze Neurological Status Epilepticus and Poor Prognostic Factors of Children

Abstract: This study was to adopt the electroencephalogram (EEG) image to analyze the neurological status epilepticus (SE) and adverse prognostic factors of children using the complex domain analysis algorithm, aiming at providing a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of children with SE. 24-hour EEG was adopted to diagnose 197 children with SE. The patients were divided into an experimental group (100 cases) and a control group (97 cases) using a random number table method. The EEGs of children in the experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%