2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chc.2004.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroencephalogram biofeedback for reading disability and traumatic brain injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
72
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Neurofeedback is an operant learning technique in which subjects learn to condition their own EEG using computer interfaces to allow the individual to become aware of and change their own brain's electrical activity. The participant is provided auditory or visual reward to initiate changes and achieve the desired effect (Thornton & Carmody, 2005). Studies report improvements in attention as a result of increasing low beta activity in healthy subjects during inhibition of sensorimotor processes (Egner, Zech, & Gruzelier, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurofeedback is an operant learning technique in which subjects learn to condition their own EEG using computer interfaces to allow the individual to become aware of and change their own brain's electrical activity. The participant is provided auditory or visual reward to initiate changes and achieve the desired effect (Thornton & Carmody, 2005). Studies report improvements in attention as a result of increasing low beta activity in healthy subjects during inhibition of sensorimotor processes (Egner, Zech, & Gruzelier, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thornton and Carmody [10] mentioned that a subject earned a standard score in the reading comprehension test after 20 sessions and the other subject after 40 sessions of NFT. The results can be explained by considering the biological basis of dyslexia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuroimaging studies pointed to functional differences, including increased activity in inferior frontal lobe and lower activity, especially in the temporal lobe as well as weak coordination between inferior frontal lobe and superior temporal gyrus [10]. Difficulties in phonological processing are associated with dysfunction of these areas as a result of structural differences [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Výsledky testů čtení více odpovídají závěrům nekontrolovaných studií aplikujících EEG biofeedback u dětí s dyslexií, které dokládaly pokroky ve čtenářské úrovni dětí (Thornton & Carmody, 2005;Walker & Norman, 2006). V kontrolované studii upozorňují na podobné zlepšení i v kontrolní skupině a zdůrazňují podíl reedukační péče na zlepšení čtenářských dovedností dětí (Breteler et al, 2010).…”
Section: Diskuseunclassified
“…Je zřejmé, že bez srovnání výsledků s kontrolní skupinou nelze činit zcela podložené závěry o účinnosti metody. Na druhou stranu nekontrolované studie se stejným zaměřením nejsou vý-jimkou a přinášejí hodnotné informace (Thornton & Carmody, 2005;Walker & Norman, 2006). 2.…”
Section: Diskuseunclassified