1965
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1965.00750050483006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrodiagnosis in Facial Palsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

1967
1967
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The CMAP latency upper limit detected in our sample (4.5 ms) is similar to the results reported by many authors 3,22,24,25 . Latency values between 6 and 8 ms as reported by Joachims et al 15 ,Gavilan et al 12 and Gavilan and Gavilan" in normal subjects were not observed in our sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The CMAP latency upper limit detected in our sample (4.5 ms) is similar to the results reported by many authors 3,22,24,25 . Latency values between 6 and 8 ms as reported by Joachims et al 15 ,Gavilan et al 12 and Gavilan and Gavilan" in normal subjects were not observed in our sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As shown in Table 3, the latency time of the affected side in group A patients (n = 162) fluctuated between 2.5 and 4 ms. This value was attributed to neuropraxia and a quick complete recovery of the nerve was expected [10,[16][17][18]. One-hundred and fortyeight out of the 162 patients had a complete and quick recovery of the facial nerve within 2 months from the onset, Table 4 summarizes the relationship between the results of ENOG and FNLT performed 14 days after the onset of paralysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prevalent qualitative tests now available are the nerve excitability test (NET) [3,4,12,13] and the maximum stimulation test (MST) [3,13]. The most common quantitative tests now available are ENOG or EEMG [5,6], FNLT [8,10,11,15,16,18] and electromyography [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longworth and Taverner 12 and Taverner 18 emphasized the value of the CMAP latency to predict the prognosis in Bell's palsy, but Esslen 3 " 5 and Zander Olsen 2 "' 21 demonstrated that the CMAP amplitude is the most important parameter. Our data corroborated this and is in accordance with previous reports 2 -5 " 7,1 ' 1,11 ' 13,16 -17,19 ' 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age ranged between 2 and 68 years old, average 32 and median 33 years old. The requirements for patient inclusion in the present study were: 1) Bell's palsy diagnosis according to Taverner 18 , 2) absence of previous peripheral facial palsy, 3) continuous follow-up until complete recovery or until the fourth month of palsy if recovery was not complete.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%