1969
DOI: 10.1080/00207216908938148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrodeless discharge as detector in the rapid determination of binary diffusion coefficient of gases†

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flux of isoprene from a leaf can be described by traditional models of diffusion as follows: uis = (Csi -CSO)gis (1) where Jls is the rate of isoprene efflux, C1si and Cs5, are the intercellular and ambient concentrations of isoprene, respectively, and gjs is the leaf conductance (stomatal plus boundary layer) to isoprene. Assuming that gis = gw(DIs/Dw) (2) where gw is the conductance to water vapor, and D1s and Dw are the diffusion coefficients for isoprene and water vapor in air, respectively, then Cisi = C1s5 + (Dw JIs/Dis gw).…”
Section: Determination Of Intercellular Isoprene Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flux of isoprene from a leaf can be described by traditional models of diffusion as follows: uis = (Csi -CSO)gis (1) where Jls is the rate of isoprene efflux, C1si and Cs5, are the intercellular and ambient concentrations of isoprene, respectively, and gjs is the leaf conductance (stomatal plus boundary layer) to isoprene. Assuming that gis = gw(DIs/Dw) (2) where gw is the conductance to water vapor, and D1s and Dw are the diffusion coefficients for isoprene and water vapor in air, respectively, then Cisi = C1s5 + (Dw JIs/Dis gw).…”
Section: Determination Of Intercellular Isoprene Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 and 7, respectively. In the same tables, the values of diffusion coefficients found in the present work, D found , and the corresponding literature values, D lit , either calculated by using the Fuller‐Schettler‐Giddings equation25 or experimentally obtained for the diffusivity of ethanol vapors in nitrogen, are also given 27. The accuracy of the method is determined as % deviation of the experimental values, D found , obtained by means of RF‐GC, from the respective literature ones, D lit .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The accuracy of the method is determined as % deviation of the experimental values, D found , obtained by means of RF‐GC, from the respective literature ones, D lit . The continuous elution GC method in a packed column was used for the determination of the experimental value for the diffusion coefficient of ethanol in nitrogen 27. The calculation of the diffusion coefficient was based on the van Deemter equation at low carrier gas flow rates while the accuracy of the D value was 2.8% 28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present method gives an alternative from the previous method [15], since the former method can be used in simultaneously determining the evaporation rates and diffusion rates of the liquid under study. The present method can be considered accurate since the results show that the diffusion in the current experiment deviates from the predicted theoretical value by less than 2.0% (based on mean values); as compared from the works by Anikar H.J.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Table I summarizes the results for the evaporation of methanol under the influence of the surfactant Triton X-100 ranging from 0 to 4 monolayers. The diffusion coefficients which are determined from this experiment were compared with the predicted values from the Fuller-Giddings equation [11] and experimentally obtained values from previous experimental work [15] which was using a different method. The uncertainty in the determination of the vaporization values, k c , varies from 0.2 to 2.5% in this case.…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%