2010
DOI: 10.1070/rc2010v079n04abeh004062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrode reactions and electroanalysis of organomercury compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 205 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if voltammetric methods are the most commonly reported, some potentiometric methods have also been developed for Hg determination (Clevenger, Smith, & Winefordner, 1997). Other authors suggest the use of anodic stripping chronopotentiometry because of the low contribution of capacitive current to the measured signal in comparison to ASV (Kurmaz & Gultyai, 2010). Some reported ASV methodologies are based on the use of simple bare electrodes as working electrode (WE), especially based on carbon and gold.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if voltammetric methods are the most commonly reported, some potentiometric methods have also been developed for Hg determination (Clevenger, Smith, & Winefordner, 1997). Other authors suggest the use of anodic stripping chronopotentiometry because of the low contribution of capacitive current to the measured signal in comparison to ASV (Kurmaz & Gultyai, 2010). Some reported ASV methodologies are based on the use of simple bare electrodes as working electrode (WE), especially based on carbon and gold.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%