2003
DOI: 10.1097/00124509-200306000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroconvulsive Therapy in Hong Kong: Rates of Use, Indications, and Outcome

Abstract: The rate of ECT use in Hong Kong continues to be below that in the United States and the United Kingdom. Access to ECT is most limited to the elderly and private patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8 The lowest rates are reported from Hungary (0.6%) and Hong Kong (1.34%Y1.88% of inpatients). 13,14 Reasons reported for low rates include legal regulations and negative attitudes toward ECT. 13 The rate of ECT use in India is similar to that reported in most countries in the Asia Pacific region, which was 9% or less.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results To Available Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The lowest rates are reported from Hungary (0.6%) and Hong Kong (1.34%Y1.88% of inpatients). 13,14 Reasons reported for low rates include legal regulations and negative attitudes toward ECT. 13 The rate of ECT use in India is similar to that reported in most countries in the Asia Pacific region, which was 9% or less.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results To Available Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this preference for bilateral ECT in the community is seen in other community surveys. 17,[21][22][23][24][25][26] C-ECT and M-ECT are not widely used in India. In our survey, they were used in 22 and 17 institutions, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Africa, TPR was 1.26 (Mugisha and Ovuga 1991). In Asia, TPR was only reported from Thailand 1.15 (Chanpattana and Kramer 2004) and Hong Kong ranging 0.27–0.34 (Chung 2003; Chung et al 2003; Chanpattana et al 2010). …”
Section: Ect Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, iP was lowest, from 0.4% to 1.3% (McCall et al 1992; Sylvester et al 2000), similar to Hong Kong was 0.6–1.8% (Chung 2003; Chung et al 2009). In Australia, iP ranged from 1% to 8% (Wood and Burgess 2003; Teh et al 2005), and in Europe from 0.6% (Hungary) (Gazdag et al 2004a) to 14% (Turkey) (Zeren et al 2003).…”
Section: Ect Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%