2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroconductive copolymer EDOT-pyrrole for intracellular recording experiments in Helix aspersa neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Tian enhanced the electrode with PU-PEDOT: PSS hydrogel, and a subsequent analysis of spike electrical signals revealed that the maximal amplitude intensity at the recording sites of the PU-PEDOT:PSS interface-modified electrode exceeded that of the PEDOT:PSS interface-modified electrode by 1.63 times, while the mean electrical signal amplitude increased from 55 µV to 78 µV [43]. Martinez-Cartagena et al recorded neuronal cell electrical signals using EDOT-pyrrole-coated electrodes, demon-strating that the altered electrodes exhibited heightened sensitivity to bioelectrical signals with a superior SNR and nearly double the signal amplitude compared to conventional Ag/AgCl electrodes [44]. This highlights the efficacy of modifying the surface of implanted electrodes with enhancers in altering the compatibility of the electrode surface with biological tissues and enhancing the electrode's capacity to capture physiological electrical signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Tian enhanced the electrode with PU-PEDOT: PSS hydrogel, and a subsequent analysis of spike electrical signals revealed that the maximal amplitude intensity at the recording sites of the PU-PEDOT:PSS interface-modified electrode exceeded that of the PEDOT:PSS interface-modified electrode by 1.63 times, while the mean electrical signal amplitude increased from 55 µV to 78 µV [43]. Martinez-Cartagena et al recorded neuronal cell electrical signals using EDOT-pyrrole-coated electrodes, demon-strating that the altered electrodes exhibited heightened sensitivity to bioelectrical signals with a superior SNR and nearly double the signal amplitude compared to conventional Ag/AgCl electrodes [44]. This highlights the efficacy of modifying the surface of implanted electrodes with enhancers in altering the compatibility of the electrode surface with biological tissues and enhancing the electrode's capacity to capture physiological electrical signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( B ) Comparison of CV curves for different modifiers. ( C ) Comparison of capacity to capture physiological electrical signals [ 6 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%