1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0728(91)85148-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemistry of xanthine oxidase at glassy carbon and mercury electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of the cathodic current over the anodic one is close to 1, suggesting that GOD undergoes a quasi-reversible redox process at the SWNT-modified electrode. The peak potential and the voltammetric characteristics are consistent with reported values for free FAD and the FAD redox center of the flavoenzyme [31,37]. The large background current is attributable to the catalytically active surface of the modified electrode.…”
Section: Direct Electrochemistry Of God At the Swnt-modified Au Electsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The ratio of the cathodic current over the anodic one is close to 1, suggesting that GOD undergoes a quasi-reversible redox process at the SWNT-modified electrode. The peak potential and the voltammetric characteristics are consistent with reported values for free FAD and the FAD redox center of the flavoenzyme [31,37]. The large background current is attributable to the catalytically active surface of the modified electrode.…”
Section: Direct Electrochemistry Of God At the Swnt-modified Au Electsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The FAD cofactor is noncovalently bonded to XO/XDH and may dissociate from the enzyme to give free FAD (which is also electroactive). A thorough and careful study revealed denaturation of bovine XO at a mercury electrode coupled with dissociation of the FAD cofactor . Dissociation of FAD should deactivate XO/XDH so proof of catalytic activity is important but is often overlooked. , Of equal concern are reports of XO/XDH catalytic electrochemistry with unnatural (and unprecedented) substrates, ,, which again cast doubt on whether a native and functional enzyme is being studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon addition of 2 mM hypoxanthine in solution, the oxidation peak current of thionine increases, while the reversed reduction peak current decreases (blue curve), suggesting that thionine shuttles electron transfer between FAD centers in XOD and the electrode and thus facilitate the oxidation of hypoxanthine at the electrode through the XODbased catalytic cycle (Scheme 1B, inset). Note that the oxidation observed here could neither be attributed to the direct electrochemistry of XOD nor to the the oxidation of hypoxanthine at the SWNT-modified electrode because the direct electron transfer of FAD/FADH 2 of XOD and the direct oxidation of hypoxanthine at carbon nanotube-modified electrodes or other kinds of electrodes occurred at more negative potentials (approximately −0.40 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [37][38][39][40] and at more positive potentials (usually higher than 0.80 V vs. Ag/AgCl), [41][42][43] respectively.…”
Section: Thionine-mediated Electron Transfer Of Xodmentioning
confidence: 75%