1993
DOI: 10.1039/dt9930000835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemistry of chlorinated ferrocenes: stability of chlorinated ferrocenium ions

Abstract: The cyclic voltammetries of 1,2,3,4,5-pentachloro-and decachloro-ferrocene have been studied in acetonitrile. The complexes undergo an irreversible two-electron oxidation consistent with an electrochemical-chemical-electrochemical mechanism at scan rates up to 1 0 V s-l. However, at the faster scan rates (up to 1 6 0 V s-l) available to electrodes of small radius and microelectrodes, chemically reversible one-electron oxidations to the chlorinated ferrocenium ions, [C,,H,,-,CI,Fe] + are obtained under ambient … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is apparent that no simple correlation exists between substituent electronegativity and E 1/2 in these complexes. Studies elsewhere have made similar observations -1,2,3,4,5-pentachloroferrocene ([FeCp(C 5 Cl 5 )], E 0 = 0.77 V vs. FcH/FcH + ; reversible only at high scan rates) 33 is reportedly much more difficult to oxidize than 1,2,3,4,5-pentafluoroferrocene ([FeCp(C 5 F 5 )], E 0 = 0.01 V vs. FcH/FcH + ). 6 [FcB(C 6 Cl 5 ) 2 ] has also been observed to exhibit a higher equilibrium potential than [FcB(C 6 F 5 ) 2 ] (E 1/2 = 0.55 V vs. 0.45 V, respectively; though the C 6 Cl 5 group is in this case considered more electron withdrawing).…”
Section: (B) Electrochemistrysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It is apparent that no simple correlation exists between substituent electronegativity and E 1/2 in these complexes. Studies elsewhere have made similar observations -1,2,3,4,5-pentachloroferrocene ([FeCp(C 5 Cl 5 )], E 0 = 0.77 V vs. FcH/FcH + ; reversible only at high scan rates) 33 is reportedly much more difficult to oxidize than 1,2,3,4,5-pentafluoroferrocene ([FeCp(C 5 F 5 )], E 0 = 0.01 V vs. FcH/FcH + ). 6 [FcB(C 6 Cl 5 ) 2 ] has also been observed to exhibit a higher equilibrium potential than [FcB(C 6 F 5 ) 2 ] (E 1/2 = 0.55 V vs. 0.45 V, respectively; though the C 6 Cl 5 group is in this case considered more electron withdrawing).…”
Section: (B) Electrochemistrysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As illustrated by the cyclic voltammograms in Figure 6a, the redox couples are reversible, with the formal potentials of the chloroand dichloro-derivatives being 0.17 and 0.31 V more positive, respectively, than the parent redox couple, as expected. 58 , respectively, compared to Fc +/0 (Figure 6b). Deviation from these values, however, provides insight into the relative rates of recombination and interception.…”
Section: Derivatives Of Ferrocenium/ferrocene As Redox Shuttlesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This also allows a comparison of all mono-and dihalogenated ferrocenes ( Figure 2, Table 1). [23,33] All compounds in this work reveal quasi-reversible one-electron waves with peak-current ratios I P Ox / I P Red of about 1 and a distorted quasi-Nernstian behavior is observed (∆E p > 59 mV). However, Randles-Sevcik plots of compounds 1 -4 showed a good reversibility at the five different scan rates 50, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 mV * s -1 ( Figure S1).…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[23] Likewise, the half-wave potential of about 256 mV is obtained from the sum of the I and F increments, and reasonable values can also be derived for the chlorinated species FcCl (168 mV) and FcCl 2 (315 mV). [33] Although fluorine is the most electronegative substituent, the half-wave potential ∆E 0 f of the fluorinated metallocenes (106 mV for 1 and 220 mV for 2) are actually lower compared than those of the other halogenated ferrocenes (160 -170 mV and 290 -320 mV; Table 1). One possible explanation is that in case of halogens besides the inductive effect (-I) a strong resonance effect (+M) plays a role as well.…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%