“…35 On the other hand, chemical derivatization can also hinder the rotation of EMF molecules in the crystals, and the structures of many EMFs have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies of their derivatives such as in the studies performed by Akasaka and coworkers (University of Tsukuba, Japan). 44 254 La, 252,253,408−414 Ce, 255 Gd, 229 Dy 258 X-ray (powder): Sc, 224 Y, 222 La, 225 Gd 226 X-ray: La, 259 Gd 260 M 2 @C 82 -II UV−vis: Er, 305 (Tm, HoTm) 306 M 2 C 2 @C 82 -II X-ray (Drv): Sc; 355 NMR-2D: Sc; 355 NMR: Sc, 403 Y; 193 UV−vis: Sc, 403 Er, 305 (40) Sm@C 90 -I X-ray 266 C 2 (42) Sm@C 90 -II X-ray 266 C 2 (45) Sm@C 90 -IV X-ray 266 C 2v (46) Sm@C 90 -III X-ray 266 C 92 C s (24) Sm@C 92 -II X-ray 264 C 1 (42) Sm@C 92 -I X-ray 264 D 3 (85) M 2 C 2 @C 92 X-ray: Gd; 363 In the field of NMR spectroscopy, structural studies gained significantly from the use of bulk electrolysis of solutions of paramagnetic EMFs, which yields their diamagnetic forms (usually monoanions) suitable for further 13 C NMR spectroscopic studies. 206 NMR studies have been also successfully performed for paramagnetic EMFs in which paramagnetism originated from encapsulated lanthanide atoms (such as Ce III in Ce 2 @C 72,78,80 ).…”