Electrochemistry of Functional Supramolecular Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9780470583463.ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemiluminescent Systems as Devices and Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 310 publications
(390 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others from the investigated Ir(pqcm) 2 (N^N) + chelates, with more extended π-aromatic N^N co-ligands, were distinctly less efficient, most probably due to smaller values of their emission quantum efficiencies as could be concluded taking into account the same sequence of the ECL intensities and the quantum efficiencies of the excited 3* Ir(pqcm) 2 (N^N) + states. Low ECL efficiency reported by Qin [ 97 ] for the ionic Ir(ppy) 2 (N^N) + chelate with 4′,5′-dimethyldithiotetrathiafulvenyl[4,5-f][ 1 , 10 ]phenanthroline co-ligand remains in agreement with the results presented by other authors. The ECL peak intensity of the studied complex was half that of Ir(ppy) 2 (phen) + in the ECL processes investigated in CH 2 Cl 2 solution containing ( n -C 4 H 9 ) 4 NClO 4 as the supporting electrolyte and TPrA as the ECL co-reactant.…”
Section: Ecl Properties Of the Heteroleptic Iridium(iii) Chelatessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others from the investigated Ir(pqcm) 2 (N^N) + chelates, with more extended π-aromatic N^N co-ligands, were distinctly less efficient, most probably due to smaller values of their emission quantum efficiencies as could be concluded taking into account the same sequence of the ECL intensities and the quantum efficiencies of the excited 3* Ir(pqcm) 2 (N^N) + states. Low ECL efficiency reported by Qin [ 97 ] for the ionic Ir(ppy) 2 (N^N) + chelate with 4′,5′-dimethyldithiotetrathiafulvenyl[4,5-f][ 1 , 10 ]phenanthroline co-ligand remains in agreement with the results presented by other authors. The ECL peak intensity of the studied complex was half that of Ir(ppy) 2 (phen) + in the ECL processes investigated in CH 2 Cl 2 solution containing ( n -C 4 H 9 ) 4 NClO 4 as the supporting electrolyte and TPrA as the ECL co-reactant.…”
Section: Ecl Properties Of the Heteroleptic Iridium(iii) Chelatessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A third reduction wave, corresponding to Ir(ppy) 3 3− formation could not be observed under the experimental conditions because of the redox potential value being more negative than the solvent cathodic limit. Adapted from ref [ 10 ] …”
Section: Ecl Properties Of the Homoleptic Iridium(iii) Chelatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 , and the competition between localization and delocalizsation in their excited states 2 . Beyond their intrinsic scientific interest, understanding and controlling this phenomenology is further motivated by the potential for the use of such complexes in diverse applications including dye-sensitized solar cells, non-linear optics, photocatalysis, biological imaging, chemical and biological sensing, photodynamic therapy, light-emitting electro-chemical cells and organic light emitting diodes 1 3 4 5 6 . As many of these applications make use of the excited state properties of these complexes a deep understanding of the low-energy excited states, particularly the lowest energy triplet state, T 1 , is required to enable the rational design of new complexes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simplified Jablonski energy diagram depicting the ground state (GS) and the triplet emissive excited states involved in the photophysics of these complexes; including e.g., the excited state involved in emission, T em ; the metal-centered triplet excited state, 3 MC; and a higher-lying triplet excited state, T m .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter complexes, their S 0 and T 1 optimized geometries are rather similar; being the main geometrical rearrangements when moving from S 0 to T 1 the change in some of the Ptligand bond distances (see Figure 4). The spin density plot of their T 1 states highlights the predominant metal-to-ligand charge transfer ( 3 MLCT) character for the complexes (e.g., 5) with the exception of that of complex 1, which can be better described as a mixed 3 MC/ 3 MLCT/ 3 LC state. For Case II complexes a UB3LYP optimization of the lowest triplet excited state leads to a metal-centered state (i.e., 3 MC), as clearly highlighted by inspecting their spin density distribution plot (see e.g., for complex 7 in Figure 4).…”
Section: Phosphorescent Energy Calculations In Complexes 1-12mentioning
confidence: 99%