2017
DOI: 10.2109/jcersj2.16286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical synthesis of ammonia using a proton conducting solid electrolyte and nickel cermet electrode

Abstract: Electrochemical synthesis of ammonia (NH 3 ) using a proton conducting solid electrolyte and nickel (Ni) cermet electrodes has been studied. As an electrolyte, BaCe 0.9 Y 0.1 O 3¹¤ (BCY) perovskite-type oxide was prepared by a co-precipitation method and its electrolyte pellet was synthesized by the sintering method with small amount of nickel oxide (NiO) as a sintering aid. The NiBCY cermet was employed as electrodes of anode and cathode. To evaluate the performance of this cell, electrochemical synthesis of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the applied potential increased from −0.577 to −0.777 V, both the rate of ammonia formation and FE declined and finally reached a value of 1.88 × 10 –10 mol mg –1 s –1 and 0.03%, respectively. This illustrates the competition between NRR and HER predominantly at high potentials, giving rise to low FEs observed at potentials below −0.377 V. The obtained results are comparable with both iron-based (nano-Fe 2 O 3 , γ-Fe 2 O 3 , nano-Fe 3 O 4 , and CoFe 2 O 4 ) ,, and non-iron-based catalysts (Ru/Cs + /MgO and BaCe 0.9 Y 0.1 O 3−δ ), , which were reported earlier for the systems that operate at relatively high temperatures (as shown in Table T1 in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As the applied potential increased from −0.577 to −0.777 V, both the rate of ammonia formation and FE declined and finally reached a value of 1.88 × 10 –10 mol mg –1 s –1 and 0.03%, respectively. This illustrates the competition between NRR and HER predominantly at high potentials, giving rise to low FEs observed at potentials below −0.377 V. The obtained results are comparable with both iron-based (nano-Fe 2 O 3 , γ-Fe 2 O 3 , nano-Fe 3 O 4 , and CoFe 2 O 4 ) ,, and non-iron-based catalysts (Ru/Cs + /MgO and BaCe 0.9 Y 0.1 O 3−δ ), , which were reported earlier for the systems that operate at relatively high temperatures (as shown in Table T1 in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, this design is possibly responsible for the low ammonia formation rates (≤3.0 × 10 –13 mol s –1 cm –2 ) observed in both types of electrochemical cells; more specifically, the hydrogen species (protons or hydrogen atoms) combined on the metal surface to form H 2 rather than reaching the Ru surface to produce ammonia. Other proton conductors that have been used as electrolytes in electrochemical cells for ammonia synthesis include BaCe 0.9 Y 0.1 O 3−δ and BaZr 0.8 Y 0.2 O 3−δ , and the N 2 reduction catalysts employed include Ni-BaCe 0.9 Y 0.1 O 3−δ , La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3−δ , Ag, and Pt . In addition, the group of Tao performed a series of ammonia synthesis experiments using oxide–carbonate electrolytes and complex metal oxide electrocatalysts, in both double-chamber and single-chamber electrolysis cells.…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Reduction Of N2 To Ammonia At High Temperat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performances of H 2 O–N 2 coelectrolytic H + -SOCs have been limited in terms of NH 3 yields and evolution rates, typically less than 1% and 10 –11 mol cm –2 s –1 , respectively. The main challenge lies in the absence of suitable cathode materials for the electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (ENRR), represented by the equation N 2 + 8H + + 6e – → 2NH 3 . The competing hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), with lower or similar redox overpotential compared to N 2 (ENRR: 0.092 V vs RHE, HER: 0.00 V vs RHE), exacerbates the situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%