2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical study of Type 304 and 316L stainless steels in simulated body fluids and cell cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…16) They reported that the proliferation of cells cultured on nonporous aluminum oxide with diameters of 30 nm (the smallest diameter examined in their work) was higher than that of cells cultured on at surfaces and nanoporous aluminum oxides with other diameters (40,45, and 50 nm). Schmuki et al also studied the adhesion, spreading, growth, and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on nanotubular titanium oxides with various diameters (15,20,30,50,70, and 100 nm) and reported that nanotubes with diameters less than 30 nm, particularly those with a diameter of 15 nm, were most preferable. 17,18) Thus, our current ndings coincide with those of previous studies obtained for different substrates, despite the distinct differences in substrate compositions, e.g., aluminum, titanium, and stainless steels.…”
Section: Cell Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…16) They reported that the proliferation of cells cultured on nonporous aluminum oxide with diameters of 30 nm (the smallest diameter examined in their work) was higher than that of cells cultured on at surfaces and nanoporous aluminum oxides with other diameters (40,45, and 50 nm). Schmuki et al also studied the adhesion, spreading, growth, and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on nanotubular titanium oxides with various diameters (15,20,30,50,70, and 100 nm) and reported that nanotubes with diameters less than 30 nm, particularly those with a diameter of 15 nm, were most preferable. 17,18) Thus, our current ndings coincide with those of previous studies obtained for different substrates, despite the distinct differences in substrate compositions, e.g., aluminum, titanium, and stainless steels.…”
Section: Cell Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were further modi ed with the following surface nishes: #2000 polished, mirror-nished, or nanopores formed at 20, 30, and 40 V. The electrochemical process used to form nanopores was carried out in ethylene glycol containing 2.0 M NaClO 4 using a two-electrode electrochemical cell with a platinum counter electrode. The sample was potentiodynamically polarized from 0 V to desired voltages (20,30, and 40 V) with a scan rate of 0.1 V/s and then kept at the voltage for 300 s. After the electrochemical process, the samples were ultrasonically cleaned in acetone and ethanol, rinsed with deionized water, and dried. The surface of the samples was characterized using a eld-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM; JSM-6500; JEOL Ltd.) and an atomic force microscope (AFM; SPM-9500; Shimadzu Co.).…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been well used in biomedical areas typically as surgical implant [1], cardiac peacemaker electrodes [2], dental fixation as plates or screws [3] and orthodontic archwires or brackets [4] due to its well-behaved corrosion resistance, excellent mechanical performance, favorable bio-affinity, as well as good machinability and low cost. Although traditional microcrystalline 304ss implants provide better biomechanical properties than other biomedical metals such as cobalt chromium alloys, titanium [5], localized corrosion of microcrystalline 304ss implants like pitting or stress corrosion were recently reported within the environment of the human body [6,7]. Even in particular cases, some metallic ions from traditional microcrystalline 304ss dissolved out and lead toxic or side effects around [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, a variety of Fe-based systems such as Fe-Mn, Fe-Pd and Fe-Mn-Si [1][2][3][4][5][6] has been or are being developed for the potential applications. The degradability of Fe-based DBMs can avoid various complications, such as chronic inflammation, thrombosis, in-stent restenosis [7,8] or even a second surgery to remove the implants [9,10], compared to the corrosion-resistant implants such as stainless steels 316L, Ti-based and Co-Cr-based alloys [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%