2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical study of the corrosion rate of carbon steel in soil: Evolution with time and determination of residual corrosion rates under cathodic protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although pH, chloride and sulfate concentration and the resulting resistivity of the soil at the test location are considered between mildly and very mildly corrosive, according to ASTM G187-12 26 , the mean corrosion rate during 100 days is nearly one order of magnitude above the value considered acceptable for buried pipelines under cathodic protection (0,01mm/year). The measured values are in reasonable agreement with weight loss measurements from Barbalat et al 27 , who found a corrosion rate around 0,1mm/year during 75 days in a soil with similar characteristics. Figure 7 shows the Raman shift spectra acquired on the AISI 1020 after an exposure time of 64 days connected to the power line tower.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although pH, chloride and sulfate concentration and the resulting resistivity of the soil at the test location are considered between mildly and very mildly corrosive, according to ASTM G187-12 26 , the mean corrosion rate during 100 days is nearly one order of magnitude above the value considered acceptable for buried pipelines under cathodic protection (0,01mm/year). The measured values are in reasonable agreement with weight loss measurements from Barbalat et al 27 , who found a corrosion rate around 0,1mm/year during 75 days in a soil with similar characteristics. Figure 7 shows the Raman shift spectra acquired on the AISI 1020 after an exposure time of 64 days connected to the power line tower.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Corrosion current has therefore long been considered an important research subject for corrosion researchers. A number of techniques have been developed and widely applied in various fields, including nuclear power systems [2][3][4], the petrochemical industry [5][6][7][8][9], aviation and space flight [10], and the construction of reinforced concrete structures [11][12][13][14][15]. These techniques can be classified into two types: non-electrochemical and electrochemical measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many electrochemical techniques for estimating corrosion kinetic parameters have been developed, including linear polarization resistance (LPR) [22][23][24][25], potentiodynamic polarization [5][6][26][27][28], electrochemical noise (ECN) [2,4,29], electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) [30][31][32][33], and harmonic distortion analysis [34][35][36]. However, each of these electrochemical techniques has advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, the kinetics of the steel dissolution processes have been quantified by plotting the Tafel lines at polarization potentials where the curve does not show a well-defined linearity due to the mass transport control occurs simultaneously [9,10]. Similarly, sometimes a Tafel region is assumed at potentials close to the OCP potential (ΔE˂90mV) which does not meet the minimum criteria to be considered in the activation control zone, because at these potentials the reverse reaction still coexists [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%