2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical storage mechanism of sodium in carbon materials: A study from soft carbon to hard carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5,6] Carbon materials are highly preferable in response to the exploration of PIB anode candidates because of their collective merits. [7][8][9] As for graphite, a commercial anode material for lithium-ion batteries, it suffers severe volume expansion upon repeated K + insertion/extraction. [10,11] Furthermore, the storage mechanism associated with ion intercalation via KC 8 only affords a mediocre theoretical specific capacity (279 mAh g −1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,6] Carbon materials are highly preferable in response to the exploration of PIB anode candidates because of their collective merits. [7][8][9] As for graphite, a commercial anode material for lithium-ion batteries, it suffers severe volume expansion upon repeated K + insertion/extraction. [10,11] Furthermore, the storage mechanism associated with ion intercalation via KC 8 only affords a mediocre theoretical specific capacity (279 mAh g −1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the structural characteristics of the soft templated carbons on their electrochemical performance was evaluated in half‐cells using sodium metal as the counter electrode and 1 m NaPF 6 in ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate (EC:DMC, 1:1 v/v) as the electrolyte, between 0.005 and 3 V. The galvanostatic discharge–charge profiles at 30 mA g −1 ( Figure a) show a common behavior: discharge curves (sodium insertion) display a sloping region above 0.1 V, predominantly associated with adsorption at edge or basal defects or insertion into enlarged interlayer spaces, and a flatter plateau region below 0.1 V, arising from Na storage within internal or “closed” pores (Figure 2d–f). [ 5,10,35–37 ] Overall, ST1500 presents the highest initial Coulombic efficiency (65%, Figure 2h) and first and second cycle capacities (523 and 354 mAh g −1 , respectively), predominantly plateau‐derived, consistent with having the highest internal pore volume and the lowest surface area and number of defects. In contrast, ST1000 shows a large and mostly sloped capacity in the first cycle, which decreases substantially in the second cycle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, the initial three curves of the NSC-600 electrode at the scan rate of 0.2 mV s −1 from 0.005 to 3.0 V are depicted in Figure 3A. The irreversible cathodic peak at around 0.88 V presented in the first cathodic scan, which is disappeared in the subsequent scans, should be ascribed to the decomposition of electrolyte to passivate the surface as well as the generation of solid electrolyte interface (SEI) (Eshetu et al, 2019;Cheng et al, 2021;Fan et al, 2021). In addition, another broad cathodic peak in the low voltage from 0.71 V to 0.005 V should be ascribed to the intercalation of Na + into the carbonaceous skeleton (Kumar et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%