2016
DOI: 10.1149/2.0031705jes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Sensor Based upon Ruthenium Doped TiO2Nanoparticles for the Determination of Flufenamic Acid

Abstract: In the current research, ruthenium stood a conspicuous dopant for TiO 2 nanoparticles, to enhance its catalytic activity. The characterization of synthesized nanoparticles was accomplished by utilizing XRD, SEM, EDX and TEM analysis. The sensing surface morphology was studied by AFM analysis. Further, we established the electrochemical behavior and detection of flufenamic acid (FFA) by utilizing ruthenium doped TiO 2 nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode (Ru-TiO 2 /CPE) at pH 6.0 by employing different… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Thus, emf measurements can be conveniently used to measure the more active element in an alloy, as illustrated in this study where the activity of Mg has been measured in molten Al. In general, recent development in sensor technology has evolved as a result of advanced method of synthesising and processing novel functional materials 13,24 , exhibiting enhanced electrochemical properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Thus, emf measurements can be conveniently used to measure the more active element in an alloy, as illustrated in this study where the activity of Mg has been measured in molten Al. In general, recent development in sensor technology has evolved as a result of advanced method of synthesising and processing novel functional materials 13,24 , exhibiting enhanced electrochemical properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active area of sensing electrode was determined according to the Randles‐Sevcik equation (Eq. 3) . The CVs for the sensor at different scan rates were recorded using 1.0 mM K 3 [Fe(CN) 6 ] and 0.1 M KCl solutions. trueIp=()2.69·1054ptn3/2A4ptD01/2υ1/2C0 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electroactive surface areas of PG and CP electrodes were evaluated by using Randles‐Sevcik formula (1) . The cyclic voltammetric technique was used for the dynamic surface area for both electrodes, 0.5 M KCl as supporting solution and 10 mM K 3 Fe(CN) 6 as a test solution at different scan rates. trueip=(2.69×105)4ptnormaln3/24ptnormalA4ptnormalD01/2υ1/2normalC04pt …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%