1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6223(97)00041-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical reduction of graphite in LiClO4-propylene carbonate electrolyte: Influence of the nature of the surface protective layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explain the evolution of the capacity values vs. temperature, one may suggest the changes occurring in the surface morphology and chemistry which could strongly modify the interaction between the carbon surface and the electrolyte. [30][31][32] Indeed, a good correlation can be established between the electrochemical performances of these carbon materials and the presence of hydrogen and alkaline cations on their surface. As mentioned in Table II, the highest r 1 , r 2 , and r 3 ratios are observed for sample 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain the evolution of the capacity values vs. temperature, one may suggest the changes occurring in the surface morphology and chemistry which could strongly modify the interaction between the carbon surface and the electrolyte. [30][31][32] Indeed, a good correlation can be established between the electrochemical performances of these carbon materials and the presence of hydrogen and alkaline cations on their surface. As mentioned in Table II, the highest r 1 , r 2 , and r 3 ratios are observed for sample 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PC is notorious for its cointercalation together with Li + ion into graphite interlayers and causes the exfoliation of graphene sheets and the formation of PC decomposition products within the interlayers releasing gases, resulting in an irreversible reaction and finally a sudden performance failure. [9][10][11][12][13] Combination of graphite anode with PC-based electrolyte in the absence of any functional electrolyte additive has thus been recognized to be the worst choice. This point motivated us to find a way out of the dilemma of PCgraphite combination, and to develop a better working electrolyte and thus a better working LIBs than commercial ones, pursuing the widened range of operation temperature and voltage window and higher performance and higher energydensity of LIBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frequently proposed chemistry is that the electrochemical reduction of EC begins at potentials Ͼ1 V, the potential where Li ϩ intercalation into graphite begins. 1,2 The products from the initial reduction of EC prevent solvent cointercalation. Further reduction may occur as the graphite is fully charged to close to the lithium metal potential, which may include reduction of the salt as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%