Electrochemical performance and microbial community profiles in microbial fuel cells in relation to electron transfer mechanisms

Abstract

BackgroundMicrobial fuel cells (MFCs) operating with complex microbial communities have been extensively reported in the past, and are commonly used in applications such as wastewater treatment, bioremediation or in-situ powering of environmental sensors. However, our knowledge on how the composition of the microbial community and the different types of electron transfer to the anode affect the performance of these bioelectrochemical systems is far from complete. To fill this gap of knowledge, we designed a set of three MFCs with different constrains limiting direct and mediated electron transfer to the anode.ResultsThe results obtained indicate that MFCs with a naked anode on which a biofilm was allowed unrestricted development (MFC-A) had the most diverse archaeal and bacterial community, and offered the best performance. In this MFC both, direct and mediated electron transfer, occurred simultaneously, but direct electron transfer was the predominant mechanism. Microbial fuel cells in which the anode was enclosed in a dialysis membrane and biofilm was not allowed to develop (MFC-D), had a much lower power output (about 60% lower), and a prevalence of dissolved redox species that acted as putative electron shuttles. In the anolyte of this MFC, Arcobacter and Methanosaeta were the prevalent bacteria and archaea respectively. In the third MFC, in which the anode had been covered by a cation selective nafion membrane (MFC-N), power output decreased a further 5% (95% less than MFC-A). In this MFC, conventional organic electron shuttles could not operate and the low power output obtained was presumably attributed to fermentation end-products produced by some of the organisms present in the anolyte, probably Pseudomonas or Methanosaeta. ConclusionElectron transfer mechanisms have an impact on the development of different microbial communities and in turn on MFC performance. Although a stable current was achieved in all cases, direct electron transfer MFC showed the best performance concluding that biofilms are the major contributors to current production in MFCs. Characterization of the complex microbial assemblages in these systems may help us to unveil new electrogenic microorganisms and improve our understanding on their role to the functioning of MFCs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12866-017-1115-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Using Cathodic Poised Potential Experiments to Investigate Extracellular Electron Transport in the Crustal Deep Biosphere of North Pond, Mid-Atlantic Ridge

“…CV peaks that may indicate a cytochrome mechanism (Bewley et al, 2013) are present in our data. Other archaea show some evidence of EET capability (Uria et al, 2017). Particle size and coccoid morphology observed by SEM are also consistent with Nanoarchaeota members (Huber et al, 2003).…”

Osmotic Pressure Compensated Solute Ectoine Improves Salt Tolerance of Microbial Cells in Microbial Fuel Cells

“…This technology has become an important technical means for studying microbial diversity and community structure in the environment [30]. The technology can explain the diversity of microorganisms in a particular ecosystem [31]. In this study, the method described in Section 2.4 was used for microbial diversity determination with the NaCl and ectoine concentrations of 30 g L -1 and 1 mmol L -1 respectively, in the MFCs substrate.…”

A two-staged system to generate electricity in microbial fuel cells using methane

“…The presence of Methylophilus also suggests that some methanol can be oxidized using diffused oxygen as an electron acceptor through Methylophilus activity. Arcobacter is a known microaerobic exoelectrogen commonly found in acetate-fed MFCs [53,54]. Acetobacterium is an acetogenic genus known to convert methanol into acetate through acetogenic fermentation [55,56].…”