“…However, some Sn-based materials such as SnO 2 , SnS 2 , and Sn-based alloys, suffer from enormous volume expansion (≈300%) during the charge-discharge process and intermediate dissolution, resulting in poor cycling stability and capacity retention [20]. In a number of Sn-based materials, Na super ionic conductor (NASICON)-type Sn-based phosphates, such as SnP 2 O 7 [12,13], LiSn 2 (PO 4 ) 3 [14][15][16], NaSn 2 (PO 4 ) 3 [17][18][19] etc, have many advantages, such as natural abundance, high ionic conductivity (about 1.5 × 10 -5 S cm -1 ), low working potential (less than 0.6 V vs. Li/Li + ), high theoretical capacity (993 mA h g -1 for Sn), more than twice of graphite (372 mAh g -1 ). Compared to Sn-based alloys, NaSn 2 (PO 4 ) 3 (NSP) not only owns an open three-dimensional (3D) framework structure, but possesses excellent structural stability and good thermal stability, resulting in smaller volume change during the charge-discharge process.…”