2020
DOI: 10.3390/w12123546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Oxidation of Effluents from Food Processing Industries: A Short Review and a Case-Study

Abstract: A short review on the treatment of effluents from food processing industries by electrochemical oxidation (EO) was performed. Olive mill wastewater (OMW) and boron-doped diamond (BDD) are the most reported effluent and anode material, respectively. The addition of NaCl or Na2SO4 as supporting electrolytes is common in these studies, and their influence on the EO performance depends, among other things, on the anode material, since the electrolyte oxidation mechanism is different when active and non-active anod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A COD removal of 22% was attained. Although it is not a remarkable removal, the treatment time was just 1 h. Since the objective was to recover phosphorus, it was not worth extending the treatment time to reach higher COD removal, as this can be performed in a secondary electrochemical treatment, without magnesium consumable anodes [62]. A COD removal of 22% was attained.…”
Section: Effect Of a Real Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A COD removal of 22% was attained. Although it is not a remarkable removal, the treatment time was just 1 h. Since the objective was to recover phosphorus, it was not worth extending the treatment time to reach higher COD removal, as this can be performed in a secondary electrochemical treatment, without magnesium consumable anodes [62]. A COD removal of 22% was attained.…”
Section: Effect Of a Real Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activated sludges have considerable energy consumption and are poorly tolerant to load and flow variations [5]. In this way, different SWW treatment processes have been investigated, namely chemical (e.g., electrochemical oxidation [6],…”
Section: Fibentech21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2020) (landfill site located in South Korea, closed in the year 2000 after eight years of operation) obtained COD 0.536 g LÀ1 and pH 8.2; and Poblete et al (2019) (landfill situated in Chile) found COD 12.3 g LÀ1 and pH 8.9. The reason for these notable differences was the variability in the production and composition of leachates in landfills(Deng and Englehardt, 2006;Mandal et al, 2017;Martínez-Cruz et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%