2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-023-5384-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical NO reduction to NH3 on Cu single atom catalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of the LSV results, the initial electrolysis potential of 0.0 V is chosen to quantitatively evaluate the NO 3 RR performance of RuO x /Pd through combined chronoamperometric (1 h electrolysis) and colorimetric measurements. Figure a shows that RuO x /Pd delivers a maximum NH 3 -Faradaic efficiency of 98.6% with a corresponding NH 3 yield rate of 23.5 mg h –1 cm –2 and a partial current density of 296.3 mA cm –2 (Figure S13) at −0.5 V vs RHE, surpassing those of almost all state-of-the-art NO 3 RR catalysts ever reported (Table S1). The controlled UV–vis tests (Figure S14) and qualitative/quantitative 14 NO 3 – / 15 NO 3 – isotope labeling nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments (Figure b and Figure S15) forcefully affirm that the generated NH 3 stems from the NO 3 RR on RuO x /Pd. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In light of the LSV results, the initial electrolysis potential of 0.0 V is chosen to quantitatively evaluate the NO 3 RR performance of RuO x /Pd through combined chronoamperometric (1 h electrolysis) and colorimetric measurements. Figure a shows that RuO x /Pd delivers a maximum NH 3 -Faradaic efficiency of 98.6% with a corresponding NH 3 yield rate of 23.5 mg h –1 cm –2 and a partial current density of 296.3 mA cm –2 (Figure S13) at −0.5 V vs RHE, surpassing those of almost all state-of-the-art NO 3 RR catalysts ever reported (Table S1). The controlled UV–vis tests (Figure S14) and qualitative/quantitative 14 NO 3 – / 15 NO 3 – isotope labeling nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments (Figure b and Figure S15) forcefully affirm that the generated NH 3 stems from the NO 3 RR on RuO x /Pd. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We then examine all possible NORR pathways and determine the most energetically preferred NORR pathway on both a-MoO 3 and Sb 1 /a-MoO 3 . As illustrated in Figure 4g, the electrocatalytic NO-to-NH 3 process generally proceeds through four pathways, namely, distal-N, distal-O, alternating-N, and alternating-O, 2,9 as well as the possible mixed pathways. The DEMS spectra (Figure 4e Figure 5a compares the free energy profiles of most energetically preferred alternating-N pathway on the Mo site (a-MoO 3 ) and Sb 1 site (Sb 1 /a-MoO 3 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 This process leads to a massive carbon footprint ca. 1.87 ton CO 2 per ton NH 3 , 14 and also requires extreme reaction conditions: high temperature (300-550 1C) and pressure (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). 15 Another route for NH 3 synthesis is through biochemical processes, in which the main practical problem found is that the series of biochemical steps would result in a delayed reaction, giving a low reaction rate that reduces costeffectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NO reduction to NH 3 or the NORR). [21][22][23] Thus, catalyzing the main reaction -the NRR, while suppressing the HER is an important goal for efficient catalyst exploration and design. Various catalytic materials and synthesis strategies have been utilized, i.e., co-catalyst addition, Anchalee Junkaew received her PhD in materials science and engineering at Texas A&M university in 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation