2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2004.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical measurements of the effects of inertial acoustic cavitation by means of a novel dual microelectrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has clear implications for the power requirements of an industrial process if surface waves activity could be scaled up to useful employment on a commercial scale [21,24]. It should also be noted that under these conditions, the absence of inertial cavitation events avoids the associated electrode erosion problems [12][13][14]. This is particularly relevant in this work in which the application of targeted bubble oscillation has been extended to electrodeposition techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has clear implications for the power requirements of an industrial process if surface waves activity could be scaled up to useful employment on a commercial scale [21,24]. It should also be noted that under these conditions, the absence of inertial cavitation events avoids the associated electrode erosion problems [12][13][14]. This is particularly relevant in this work in which the application of targeted bubble oscillation has been extended to electrodeposition techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, while these high rates of mass transfer are attractive, the presence of inertial cavitation can lead to problems with erosion [12][13][14] that may interfere with the desired process. Also, it is known that driving pressure fields in excess of ~100 kPa are required to generate inertial cavitation (under continuous sound irradiation in water and normal temperature and pressure conditions [11,15]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it would not be correct to equate the bubble activity in the cleaning bath with that which occurs in the UAS. The ultrasonic cleaning bath causes cavitation, whereby bubbles collapse under ultrasound to generate shock waves [27][28][29] and can also involute to form microjets [30,31], both of which can remove material from surfaces [32,33]. In contrast, the UAS system projects sound down a column of water [34] in order to excite surface waves [35][36][37] on the walls of microscopic bubbles on the surface to be cleaned.…”
Section: Cold Water Cleaning In An Ultrasonically Activated Strementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly distinguishing between these mechanisms requires local knowledge of both mass transfer and surface erosion. This has recently been achieved through the deployment of a novel dual microelectrode into a cavitation environment [23,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%