11Research efforts on the CuCl(aq)/HCl(aq) electrolyzer would greatly benefit from the ability to 12 quantify the dissipative processes that undesirably increase the cell's applied potential, E cell , 13 which decreases its efficiency. To date, little is known about what impact further improvements 14 to active surface area, extent of CuCl(aq) conversion and ohmic resistance would exactly have 15 on the electrolyzer performance. To better understand how this electrolyzer can be improved, a 16 model was developed to quantify and separate the effects of electrochemical kinetics, membrane 17 transport and open circuit potential, E OCP, on E cell for a given current density. By employing data 18 obtained from previous studies with electrochemical cells into the developed model, it was 19 possible to calculate E cell values that agreed with data collected from a lab scale electrolyzer 20 using just one adjustable parameter, the Nernst diffusion layer at limiting current. The model was 21 then used to identify the predicted E cell contributions as a function of CuCl(aq) conversion, active 22 electrode area and ohmic resistance. It was found that the extent of CuCl(aq) conversion can 23 © 2015. This manuscript version is made available under the Elsevier user license http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ 2 density. Overall, E cell could be most readily reduced by improving R ohm , whereas improvements 3 to electrode kinetics have limited impacts.4 5 Keywords 6 CuCl(aq)/HCl(aq) Electrolyzer, Electrochemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, Current-Potential 7 Modeling, Conversion 8 9 12 continue. One option for storing harnessed thermal and electric energy is the hybrid Cu-Cl 13 thermochemical cycle to efficiently produce hydrogen [1,2]. When compared to other 14 thermochemical cycles under development, previous research found that the four-step Cu-Cl 15 hybrid thermochemical cycle had significantly lower temperature requirements [1]. For example, 16 while the hybrid-sulfur thermochemical cycle required operating temperatures above 800 °C [3], 17 the four-step Cu-Cl hybrid thermochemical cycle only needed temperatures up to 550 °C [4].
18Given that much of the energy needed for this cycle to split the water is obtained from thermal 19 energy, the electric energy needed to split water by the Cu-Cl cycle has been shown to be 20 considerably less than an acid or alkaline electrolyzers [5]. After including the efficiency loss 21 from electricity production, the overall efficiency this cycle can be between 30-50 %, whereas 22 conventional water electrolysis is between 18-24 % [6]. Additionally, many studies were carried 23 16 transport limitations, and electrode overpotentials for the CuCl(aq)/HCl(aq) electrolyzer. The 17 advantage of this model over other models is that it uses fundamental thermodynamic, kinetic 18 and transport coefficients in non-equilibrium thermodynamic relations, making extrapolations 19 more reliable. The model parameters were obtained through experimental methods using single 20 cells wher...