2002
DOI: 10.1149/1.1456919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Evaluation and Structural Characterization of Commercial LiCoO[sub 2] Surfaces Modified with MgO for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Abstract: Commercial cathode material LiCoO 2 was modified by coating its surface with a thin layer of amorphous magnesium oxide ͑MgO͒. The surface morphology, crystalline structure, and electrochemical performance of the modified cathode material were characterized and compared with that of pristine LiCoO 2 . It is found that surface modification can improve the structural stability of LiCoO 2 without decreasing its available specific capacity. Specific capacities of 145, 175, and 210 mAh/g were obtained in test cells … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
98
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 However, different morphologies of MgO coating layer have been reported by other research group. 6,[21][22][23][24] In order to examine the morphology effect, we prepared two types of MgO coated-LiCoO 2 thin film electrodes at room temperature and high temperature. The stability at high potential cycling was investigated by electrochemical measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 However, different morphologies of MgO coating layer have been reported by other research group. 6,[21][22][23][24] In order to examine the morphology effect, we prepared two types of MgO coated-LiCoO 2 thin film electrodes at room temperature and high temperature. The stability at high potential cycling was investigated by electrochemical measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[102,103] We developed a simple co-precipitation method to coat Al 2 O 3 or MgO on commercial LiCoO 2 (Nippon Chemical Industry) and nano-LiCoO 2 in 2002. [104][105][106] As shown in Figure 13a, Figure 13b shows the effect of an Al 2 O 3 coating on improving the cyclic performance. [105] The understanding of the coating mechanism was argued at that time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant number of studies was conducted to understand the capacity fading mechanism over 4.2 V as well as to improve the capacity of LiCoO 2 by pushing the upper cut-off voltage above 4.2 V while keeping the cycle life at a reasonable level (i.e.,~500 cycles) [34][35][36][37]. It was shown by many that the cycle life of LiCoO 2 at higher voltages (i.e., >4.2 V) can be improved by metal oxide coatings such as Al 2 O 3 , SnO 2 , ZrO 2 , TiO 2 , MgO, [34,[38][39][40][41][42], metal phosphate coatings such as AlPO 4 [43][44][45][46], metal fluoride coatings such as AlF 3 and LaF 3 [47,48] and multicomponent metal fluoride coatings such as aluminum-tungsten-fluoride (AlW x F y ) [49]. Although the underlying reasons for such an improvement in cycle life of LiCoO 2 at higher cut-off voltages due to coatings are still debatable [35,50,51], following mechanisms have been suggested: coating (i) inhibits the structural transformation [34,52], (ii) acts as a physical barrier, Figure 9, between the electrolyte and the active material, and prevents the trace amounts of hydrogen fluoride (HF) and water present in the electrolyte from reaching the active material thus effectively suppresses cobalt dissolution and the associated oxygen evolution [53,54], (iii) converts Lewis acids which in return corrode the insulating surface species and improves the electronic conductivity of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer on LiCoO 2 [50].…”
Section: Cathodementioning
confidence: 99%