2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Energy Storage: Questioning the Popular v/v1/2 Scan Rate Diagnosis in Cyclic Voltammetry

Abstract: The v/v 1/2 scan rate diagnosis in electrochemical energy storage devices is based on application of the relationship i = k 1 v + k 2 v 1/2 (where k 1 and k 2 are two constants independent of the scan rate v) to the variation of the cyclic voltammetric responses with v. Several examples show that application of this scan rate diagnosis procedure leads to absurd results because the procedure is inappropriate under these conditions. It follows that the best approach is to simply forget about this v/v 1/2 scan ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Costentin has argued that “pseudocapacitance” is an incorrect notion where such reported box‐like (redox pseudocapacitive) CV curves should be interpreted as EDLC and peak‐like (intercalation pseudocapacitive) curves should be interpreted as normal battery‐like intercalation undergoing slow charge transfer or ohmic drop. [ 60,63 ] That latter interpretation, however, is compatible with the broad definition above for intercalation pseudocapacitance where the question should become whether this behavior is worthy of a special name “intercalation pseudocapacitance.” We thus continue to use the term intercalation pseudocapacitance here. Others have extended the pseudocapacitance definition to be further constrained to examples exhibiting a linear relationship between the applied potential and the state of charge such as RuO 2 (Figure 2a).…”
Section: Rapid Intercalation Materials and Pseudocapacitancementioning
confidence: 61%
“…Costentin has argued that “pseudocapacitance” is an incorrect notion where such reported box‐like (redox pseudocapacitive) CV curves should be interpreted as EDLC and peak‐like (intercalation pseudocapacitive) curves should be interpreted as normal battery‐like intercalation undergoing slow charge transfer or ohmic drop. [ 60,63 ] That latter interpretation, however, is compatible with the broad definition above for intercalation pseudocapacitance where the question should become whether this behavior is worthy of a special name “intercalation pseudocapacitance.” We thus continue to use the term intercalation pseudocapacitance here. Others have extended the pseudocapacitance definition to be further constrained to examples exhibiting a linear relationship between the applied potential and the state of charge such as RuO 2 (Figure 2a).…”
Section: Rapid Intercalation Materials and Pseudocapacitancementioning
confidence: 61%
“…S8a in the ESI †) were obtained. Assuming that the current obeys a power-law relationship with the scan rate as follows: [36][37][38]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent work on modelling CVs find that Equation 2 is an oversimplification of experimental currents and is particularly erroneous at high scan rates [43–45] . One approach to address this issue is using multiple step chronoamperometry (MUSCA) to reconstruct CVs, minimize ohmic losses, and allow application of Equation 2 [46] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%