2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical determination of Cephalothin antibiotic by adsorptive stripping voltammetric technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature and acidity of the supporting buffer are some of the most important factors which strongly influence the stability of the analyte and its cathodic reduction as well as the adsorption processes [30]. Among the various investigated buffers (Britton-Robinson, acetate and phosphate) the best voltammetric signal in terms of sensitivity (peak height) and resolution (peak shape) have been available using Britton-Robinson buffer.…”
Section: Voltammetric Studies Of Cefepimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature and acidity of the supporting buffer are some of the most important factors which strongly influence the stability of the analyte and its cathodic reduction as well as the adsorption processes [30]. Among the various investigated buffers (Britton-Robinson, acetate and phosphate) the best voltammetric signal in terms of sensitivity (peak height) and resolution (peak shape) have been available using Britton-Robinson buffer.…”
Section: Voltammetric Studies Of Cefepimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many analytical techniques available to quantify cefazolin in a variety of human biological fluids, including plasma (total and unbound), urine, peritoneal dialysate, micro‐dialysate and serum (El‐Shaboury et al ., ). These techniques use liquid chromatography (LC) combined with ultra‐violet detection (Al‐Rawithi et al ., ; Baranowska et al ., ; Bayoumi et al ., ; Bompadre et al ., ; Chang et al ., ; Kamani et al ., ; Liang et al ., ; Martinez et al ., ; Murillo et al ., ; Nahata, ; Sorensen and Snor, ; Tsai and Chen, ; van Kralingen et al ., ; Wold and Turnipseed, ), visible spectrophotometric detection (El‐Shaboury et al ., ; Saleh et al ., ), tandem mass spectrometry (Daeseleire et al ., ; Hou et al ., ; Parker et al ., ) and spectro‐fluorometric methods (Yang et al ., ; Navarro et al ., ), chemi‐luminescence methods (Schulman et al ., ; Sun et al ., ) and electrochemical determination using adsorptive stripping voltammetry (Al‐ghamdi et al ., ). There are significantly fewer analytical techniques available to quantify cefalothin in human biological fluids; these are limited to total plasma (McWhinney et al ., ) and unbound plasma (Briscoe et al ., ), serum (Cooper et al ., ; Parker et al ., ; Wold and Turnipseed, ) and urine (Cooper et al ., ) using the techniques of LC combined with ultra‐violet detection (Cooper et al ., ; McWhinney et al ., ; Wold and Turnipseed, ) and tandem mass spectrometry (Parker et al ., ; Sime et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods have been reported for determination of CF [9,10] or conjugated residues of CF [3] in milk. Electroanalytical techniques have been used to determine other cephalosporins, such as cefpodoxime proxetil [11], ceftazidime [12], cephalothin [13], cefminox [14], cefetamet-Na [15], cephalexin [16], cefaclor [17], ceftriaxone [18], cefixime [19], and cefepime [20], providing sensitivity equivalent to that of HPLC techniques. Most cephalosporins are electroactive by virtue of reduction of the (D 3 ) double bond of the cephem nucleus and possibly because of the presence of reducible substituents at the C 7 or C 3 positions in the molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%