2022
DOI: 10.3390/bios12010039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Detection Platform Based on RGO Functionalized with Diazonium Salt for DNA Hybridization

Abstract: In this paper, we propose an improved electrochemical platform based on graphene for the detection of DNA hybridization. Commercial screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) were used for this purpose due to their ease of functionalization and miniaturization opportunities. SPCEs were modified with reduced graphene oxide (RGO), offering a suitable surface for further functionalization. Therefore, aryl-carboxyl groups were integrated onto RGO-modified electrodes by electrochemical reduction of the corresponding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the intensity ratio of the D and G bands (I D /I G ) increased from 0.77, measured for GO, to 1.22 in the case of RGO, clearly indicating an elevated level of defects in the structural framework of RGO caused by the reduction in graphitic domains when functional groups were removed from the GO surface. These results are not only confirmed by our previous studies [39,40] but also by other research groups like Das et al [42] and Bharath et al [43].…”
Section: Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the intensity ratio of the D and G bands (I D /I G ) increased from 0.77, measured for GO, to 1.22 in the case of RGO, clearly indicating an elevated level of defects in the structural framework of RGO caused by the reduction in graphitic domains when functional groups were removed from the GO surface. These results are not only confirmed by our previous studies [39,40] but also by other research groups like Das et al [42] and Bharath et al [43].…”
Section: Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…First, a bare SPCE was investigated (Figure 2A) to serve as a baseline for comparison with subsequent modifications. The image shows a clean, unmodified surface, typical for this substrate as observed in our previous studies [39,40]. Figure 2B presents the electrode modified with GO, showing thin (probably just few stratum of GO sheets), wrinkled, transparent layers covering the carbon electrode, a morphology that does not suffer drastic changes after GO electrochemical reduction, as observed in Figure 2C.…”
Section: Morphological Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the electrochemical biosensors’ context, the electrochemically assisted covalent modification of the electrode surface is usually selected due to the possibility to easily control the surface reaction, and thus improve the overall reproducibility of the sensor fabrication process [ 1 ]. For example, the electrochemical reduction of aryl diazonium salts became a well-established tool for biosensor development [ 7 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 ]. Despite several challenges such as controlling the surface composition when preparing mixed layers, diazonium electrografting is simple, versatile, and, unlike the self-assembly method, involves short preparation times and long-term stability [ 155 ].…”
Section: Challenges In Generating Aptamer-modified Electrodes Suitabl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the versatile nature of NH 2 -PEG-rGO extends beyond its role as a support material for ssDNA immobilization, encompassing the facile adsorption of ssDNA on the rGO lattice, which involves both covalent and non-covalent interactions, with a particular emphasis on non-covalent pi-stacking interactions as the primary pathway. Conversely, double-stranded (ds) DNA exhibits a weaker binding affinity to the rGO surface compared to ssDNA, primarily because of the electrostatic repulsion from the phosphate backbone [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%