2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16176-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical detection of uric acid in undiluted human saliva using uricase paper integrated electrodes

Abstract: In this study, we introduce a uricase-immobilized paper (UOx­-paper) integrated electrochemical sensor for detection of uric acid (UA) in saliva. The UOx was immobilized on the detection zone in the wax-patterned paper substrate. This UOx-paper was integrated with a Prussian blue­-modified, screen-printed carbon electrode after electropolymerization of o-phenylenediamine to construct an electrochemical cell for small-volume (20 μL) of samples. First, we optimized the fabrication conditions of UOx-paper. Next, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The achieved sensing performance results are shown in Table 1 . As shown in Table 1 , the cobalt oxide/GCE sensor showed ultra-high sensitivity compared to previously reported literature [ 11 , 24 , 30 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. Furthermore, the DPV technique showed ~7.58 times high sensitivity (3566.5 µAmM −1 cm −2 ) compared to CV’s measured sensitivity (470.4 µAmM −1 cm −2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The achieved sensing performance results are shown in Table 1 . As shown in Table 1 , the cobalt oxide/GCE sensor showed ultra-high sensitivity compared to previously reported literature [ 11 , 24 , 30 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. Furthermore, the DPV technique showed ~7.58 times high sensitivity (3566.5 µAmM −1 cm −2 ) compared to CV’s measured sensitivity (470.4 µAmM −1 cm −2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Saliva is a vital sample to analyze for noninvasive testing. As shown in Table , ,,, we summarize the classic articles on saliva detection sensors in recent years and compare their analytes, materials, and processing methods. The saliva secreted by salivary glands into the mouth contains biomarkers such as glucose, lactic acid, phosphoric acid, α-amylase, hormones (cortisol and steroids), immunoglobulin, and bacteria. ,, They can be used as indicators for disease diagnoses such as psychological stress, HIV, intestinal infection, oral ulcers, and cancer. ,, The saliva analysis devices are designed either to collect saliva and diagnose it off-site , or to integrate the collection and analysis process into a flexible and wearable platform for real-time monitoring .…”
Section: Biochemical Signal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various analytical approaches for ammonium detection have been reported, including chromatography, spectrophotometry, and electrochemistry in saliva or plasma. Despite being very precise in identifying ammonia, these approaches are so time-consuming that they are unsuitable for point-of-care (POC) monitoring and real-time monitoring of ammonia. , Besides these techniques, biopsy is the gold standard for detecting chronic liver disorders and stomach cancer. Biopsy can be challenging to execute regularly since it is uncomfortable and painful and sometimes can be a triggering point of the progression risk .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%