2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2005.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical detection of the immobilization and hybridization of unlabeled linear and hairpin DNA on gold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, EIS circumvents the labeling of at least one compound of the assay with, for example, enzymes, fluorophores, or redox reporters and can hence be considered as a label-free approach for detecting complementary recognition events at surfaces. [6][7][8][9] Therefore, EIS has been successfully applied for the detection of DNA conductivity, [10] DNA hybridization, [11][12][13][14][15] single-nucleotide mismatches in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), [16] in situ hybridization of PNA/DNA, [17] DNA and RNA replication, [18,19] and the interaction of metal ions with DNA. [20,21] DNA detection by means of EIS is based on the repulsion between the DNA-modified electrode and a free-diffusing redox reporter, typically [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3À/4À .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, EIS circumvents the labeling of at least one compound of the assay with, for example, enzymes, fluorophores, or redox reporters and can hence be considered as a label-free approach for detecting complementary recognition events at surfaces. [6][7][8][9] Therefore, EIS has been successfully applied for the detection of DNA conductivity, [10] DNA hybridization, [11][12][13][14][15] single-nucleotide mismatches in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), [16] in situ hybridization of PNA/DNA, [17] DNA and RNA replication, [18,19] and the interaction of metal ions with DNA. [20,21] DNA detection by means of EIS is based on the repulsion between the DNA-modified electrode and a free-diffusing redox reporter, typically [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3À/4À .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as it is well known that the mole ratio can influence probe density, [17] different proportions of DNA and MCB were chosen while keeping a constant total thiol concentration (DNA + MCB) of 50 mm. [28] Experimental Section…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various immobilization procedures were considered (Scheme 1): 1) a one-step adsorption procedure, in which the DNA probe and the diluent were assembled together [14,28,29] (hereafter procedure P1 or co-adsorption procedure); 2) the conventional two-step adsorption method, in which DNA is immobilized first (hereafter referred to as procedure P2 or classical two-step procedure); 3) the reversed two-step procedure, in which the diluent is adsorbed first (hereafter procedure P3). The DNA sequence was an 18-mer oligonucleotide modified by an alkylthiol chain in the 5' end for the formation of a covalent bond with the gold surface, and by a fluorescent boron-dipyrromethene (BODIPY) dye in the 3' end for spectroelectrochemical measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, the most common hairpin probe immobilization strategy is the self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) technology because of the ease of fabrication, and reasonable reproducibility, storage stability and regeneration of resulting sensing phases [19]. Chronocoulometry studies showed that lower surface density is achieved using thiolated hairpin compared to linear ssDNA under the same deposition conditions on gold electrodes [20].…”
Section: Probe Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%