Electrochemical Desalination and Recovery of Lithium from Saline Water upon Operation of a Capacitive Deionization Cell Combined with a Redox Flow Battery
Abstract:With the drastic growth in the demand for lithium, recovery technologies that remove Li ions from a brine solution are attracting more interest. In this field, capacitive deionization (CDI) has been suggested in various studies because it is energy efficient, economical, and environmentally friendly. These selective processes, however, have not been accompanied by desalination, which is a nonselective process by which salt ions are removed from the brine. In this work, a new-concept system has been designed fo… Show more
“…Ions constitute a major subset of contaminants found in water. When present even at low concentration, ions like F – , CrO 4 2– , AsO 4 3– , Hg 2+ , and Pb 2+ can pose a threat to the health of humans and animals. − For this reason, researchers have studied and developed platforms for targeted removal of ionic contaminants using CDI. − Selective adsorption by CDI can also be employed to recover valuable elements, such as lithium, − phosphorus, − and nitrogen. ,− In this section, we briefly review several experimental works that focus on selective separation of ions from multicomponent solutions using porous carbon electrodes. In particular, we focus on studies that involve either two monovalent ions or one monovalent and one divalent ion, and we exclude studies that involve mixtures of more than two competing ions because of the complexity of these systems. − We then discuss the quantification of ion selectivity via a separation factor.…”
Agricultural development, extensive industrialization, and rapid growth of the global population have inadvertently been accompanied by environmental pollution. Water pollution is exacerbated by the decreasing ability of traditional treatment methods to comply with tightening environmental standards. This review provides a comprehensive description of the principles and applications of electrochemical methods for water purification, ion separations, and energy conversion. Electrochemical methods have attractive features such as compact size, chemical selectivity, broad applicability, and reduced generation of secondary waste. Perhaps the greatest advantage of electrochemical methods, however, is that they remove contaminants directly from the water, while other technologies extract the water from the contaminants, which enables efficient removal of trace pollutants. The review begins with an overview of conventional electrochemical methods, which drive chemical or physical transformations via Faradaic reactions at electrodes, and proceeds to a detailed examination of the two primary mechanisms by which contaminants are separated in nondestructive electrochemical processes, namely electrokinetics and electrosorption. In these sections, special attention is given to emerging methods, such as shock electrodialysis and Faradaic electrosorption. Given the importance of generating clean, renewable energy, which may sometimes be combined with water purification, the review also discusses inverse methods of electrochemical energy conversion based on reverse electrosorption, electrowetting, and electrokinetic phenomena. The review concludes with a discussion of technology comparisons, remaining challenges, and potential innovations for the field such as process intensification and technoeconomic optimization.
“…Ions constitute a major subset of contaminants found in water. When present even at low concentration, ions like F – , CrO 4 2– , AsO 4 3– , Hg 2+ , and Pb 2+ can pose a threat to the health of humans and animals. − For this reason, researchers have studied and developed platforms for targeted removal of ionic contaminants using CDI. − Selective adsorption by CDI can also be employed to recover valuable elements, such as lithium, − phosphorus, − and nitrogen. ,− In this section, we briefly review several experimental works that focus on selective separation of ions from multicomponent solutions using porous carbon electrodes. In particular, we focus on studies that involve either two monovalent ions or one monovalent and one divalent ion, and we exclude studies that involve mixtures of more than two competing ions because of the complexity of these systems. − We then discuss the quantification of ion selectivity via a separation factor.…”
Agricultural development, extensive industrialization, and rapid growth of the global population have inadvertently been accompanied by environmental pollution. Water pollution is exacerbated by the decreasing ability of traditional treatment methods to comply with tightening environmental standards. This review provides a comprehensive description of the principles and applications of electrochemical methods for water purification, ion separations, and energy conversion. Electrochemical methods have attractive features such as compact size, chemical selectivity, broad applicability, and reduced generation of secondary waste. Perhaps the greatest advantage of electrochemical methods, however, is that they remove contaminants directly from the water, while other technologies extract the water from the contaminants, which enables efficient removal of trace pollutants. The review begins with an overview of conventional electrochemical methods, which drive chemical or physical transformations via Faradaic reactions at electrodes, and proceeds to a detailed examination of the two primary mechanisms by which contaminants are separated in nondestructive electrochemical processes, namely electrokinetics and electrosorption. In these sections, special attention is given to emerging methods, such as shock electrodialysis and Faradaic electrosorption. Given the importance of generating clean, renewable energy, which may sometimes be combined with water purification, the review also discusses inverse methods of electrochemical energy conversion based on reverse electrosorption, electrowetting, and electrokinetic phenomena. The review concludes with a discussion of technology comparisons, remaining challenges, and potential innovations for the field such as process intensification and technoeconomic optimization.
“…This method is suitable for the extraction of lithium from low-grade brines with a high Mg 2+ /Li + mass ratio. The adsorption materials for lithium include lithium manganese oxide (LMO) and lithium titanium oxide (LTO) ion sieves, as well as lithium/aluminum layered double hydroxide (Li/Al LDH). − …”
Section: Extraction Of Lithium From Salt Lake Brinesmentioning
Salt lake brines have become the main source of lithium
owing to
their abundant reserves and low extraction costs. The low absolute
concentration of Li+ and the complexity of accompanying
ions in the brines are crucial issues, thereby inspiring the development
of a variety of lithium extraction technologies. Among them, electrodialysis
(ED) enables acceptable separation performance, reduced energy consumption,
and near-zero pollution toward salt lake brines with a high Mg2+/Li+ mass ratio. Most recently, the rapid advancement
of integrated ED technologies and emerging strategies for membrane
material fabrications are conducive to facilitating the implementation
of this technology. The newly proposed processes can achieve higher
energy utilization and enhance the concentration of lithium salt products.
For membrane materials, the superior permselectivity between lithium
and magnesium is still the current pursuit. The key metrics for developing
membranes involve tuning the materials’ hydrophilicity, pore
size, and charge. Among them, due to the rise of lithium-specific
recognition materials, it is believed that coupling them with ED technology
to achieve efficient and precise extraction of lithium will be the
future development direction.
“…69 The higher Na Li + + with such intercalation electrodes is largely due to the smaller Li + ionic diameter in crystal form, as Li + is 1.2 Å and smaller than the 1.9 Å of Na + . 56,116,117 Several other selectivity mechanisms relevant to ED and CDI have been studied as a means to perform this separation, including Na + selectivity due to its smaller hydrated diameter, 49,118 chemical affinity of Li + toward chemical groups in the ED CEM, such as a LiCo 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 spinel type adsorbent, 82 and intercalation CEMs, such as Li 0.33 La 0.56 TiO 3 . 119 We also tabulate in Figure 2 selectivity is not achieved by either ED or CDI, likely due to its much larger hydrated diameter of 7.6 Å compared to 6.6 Å of Cl − .…”
Section: Kesore Et Al Demonstrated An Exceptionally Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using such cathodes boosts Li + selectivity when compared to achieved using a CDI cell with porous carbon electrodes . The higher with such intercalation electrodes is largely due to the smaller Li + ionic diameter in crystal form, as Li + is 1.2 Å and smaller than the 1.9 Å of Na + . ,, Several other selectivity mechanisms relevant to ED and CDI have been studied as a means to perform this separation, including Na + selectivity due to its smaller hydrated diameter, , chemical affinity of Li + toward chemical groups in the ED CEM, such as a LiCo 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 spinel type adsorbent, and intercalation CEMs, such as Li 0.33 La 0.56 TiO 3 …”
Section: Comparing Achieved Ion
Selectivity In Ed and CDImentioning
Ion-selective
removal is an important frontier in water
purification
technologies. For many emerging applications, removing all ions indiscriminately
can lead to excessive energy consumption, high levelized cost of water,
poor effluent water quality, and increased waste brine volume. Electrodialysis
and capacitive deionization are two electrochemical water purification
technologies which are promising toward tunable, ion-selective purification.
These technologies have fundamentally different ion removal mechanisms,
as electrodialysis leverages electrodiffusion through ion-exchange
membranes while capacitive deionization utilizes electrosorption into
charged electrodes. We here provide a direct comparison of ion selectivity
achieved by these two technologies, focusing on several important
ion pairs. We highlight distinct differences in achieved selectivity
between these technologies and provide theory results to connect such
observations to ion removal mechanisms. Based on the experimental
literature, we find that capacitive deionization demonstrates a wider
range of achieved ion selectivities than electrodialysis for competing
cations such as Na+ vs Ca2+ and Li+ vs Na+, while a wider range is observed for electrodialysis
when separating anion pairs such as Cl– vs SO4
2– and Cl– vs NO3
–. We conclude with reviewing “knobs”
that can be adjusted to tune the achieved selectivities by both technologies,
and emphasize important questions that should be answered in future
studies to improve the selectivity of both technologies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.