The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.1c00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Desalination and Recovery of Lithium from Saline Water upon Operation of a Capacitive Deionization Cell Combined with a Redox Flow Battery

Abstract: With the drastic growth in the demand for lithium, recovery technologies that remove Li ions from a brine solution are attracting more interest. In this field, capacitive deionization (CDI) has been suggested in various studies because it is energy efficient, economical, and environmentally friendly. These selective processes, however, have not been accompanied by desalination, which is a nonselective process by which salt ions are removed from the brine. In this work, a new-concept system has been designed fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ions constitute a major subset of contaminants found in water. When present even at low concentration, ions like F – , CrO 4 2– , AsO 4 3– , Hg 2+ , and Pb 2+ can pose a threat to the health of humans and animals. For this reason, researchers have studied and developed platforms for targeted removal of ionic contaminants using CDI. Selective adsorption by CDI can also be employed to recover valuable elements, such as lithium, phosphorus, and nitrogen. , In this section, we briefly review several experimental works that focus on selective separation of ions from multicomponent solutions using porous carbon electrodes. In particular, we focus on studies that involve either two monovalent ions or one monovalent and one divalent ion, and we exclude studies that involve mixtures of more than two competing ions because of the complexity of these systems. We then discuss the quantification of ion selectivity via a separation factor.…”
Section: Electrosorptive Separationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ions constitute a major subset of contaminants found in water. When present even at low concentration, ions like F – , CrO 4 2– , AsO 4 3– , Hg 2+ , and Pb 2+ can pose a threat to the health of humans and animals. For this reason, researchers have studied and developed platforms for targeted removal of ionic contaminants using CDI. Selective adsorption by CDI can also be employed to recover valuable elements, such as lithium, phosphorus, and nitrogen. , In this section, we briefly review several experimental works that focus on selective separation of ions from multicomponent solutions using porous carbon electrodes. In particular, we focus on studies that involve either two monovalent ions or one monovalent and one divalent ion, and we exclude studies that involve mixtures of more than two competing ions because of the complexity of these systems. We then discuss the quantification of ion selectivity via a separation factor.…”
Section: Electrosorptive Separationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is suitable for the extraction of lithium from low-grade brines with a high Mg 2+ /Li + mass ratio. The adsorption materials for lithium include lithium manganese oxide (LMO) and lithium titanium oxide (LTO) ion sieves, as well as lithium/aluminum layered double hydroxide (Li/Al LDH). …”
Section: Extraction Of Lithium From Salt Lake Brinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…69 The higher Na Li + + with such intercalation electrodes is largely due to the smaller Li + ionic diameter in crystal form, as Li + is 1.2 Å and smaller than the 1.9 Å of Na + . 56,116,117 Several other selectivity mechanisms relevant to ED and CDI have been studied as a means to perform this separation, including Na + selectivity due to its smaller hydrated diameter, 49,118 chemical affinity of Li + toward chemical groups in the ED CEM, such as a LiCo 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 spinel type adsorbent, 82 and intercalation CEMs, such as Li 0.33 La 0.56 TiO 3 . 119 We also tabulate in Figure 2 selectivity is not achieved by either ED or CDI, likely due to its much larger hydrated diameter of 7.6 Å compared to 6.6 Å of Cl − .…”
Section: Kesore Et Al Demonstrated An Exceptionally Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using such cathodes boosts Li + selectivity when compared to achieved using a CDI cell with porous carbon electrodes . The higher with such intercalation electrodes is largely due to the smaller Li + ionic diameter in crystal form, as Li + is 1.2 Å and smaller than the 1.9 Å of Na + . ,, Several other selectivity mechanisms relevant to ED and CDI have been studied as a means to perform this separation, including Na + selectivity due to its smaller hydrated diameter, , chemical affinity of Li + toward chemical groups in the ED CEM, such as a LiCo 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 spinel type adsorbent, and intercalation CEMs, such as Li 0.33 La 0.56 TiO 3 …”
Section: Comparing Achieved Ion Selectivity In Ed and CDImentioning
confidence: 99%