2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical degradation of the herbicide picloram using a filter-press flow reactor with a boron-doped diamond or β-PbO 2 anode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Figure 5 shows that 1, 2-DCB and 1, 4-DCB appears to be destroyed at slower rate using a PbO 2 anode and completely removed in a time much more than 240 min. It is well known that •OH formed at BDD remains mainly free on its surface where it attacks non-selectively and directly organics, whereas this radical is adsorbed on the PbO 2 surface, where it reacts selectively and more slowly with adsorbed organics [35]. According to this behavior, several authors recently reported that phenol, o-substituted phenols and nitrophenol pesticide are more rapidly destroyed with BDD than with PbO 2 using small conventional electrolytic cells [36].…”
Section: Decay Kinetics Of Dichlorobenzenementioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, Figure 5 shows that 1, 2-DCB and 1, 4-DCB appears to be destroyed at slower rate using a PbO 2 anode and completely removed in a time much more than 240 min. It is well known that •OH formed at BDD remains mainly free on its surface where it attacks non-selectively and directly organics, whereas this radical is adsorbed on the PbO 2 surface, where it reacts selectively and more slowly with adsorbed organics [35]. According to this behavior, several authors recently reported that phenol, o-substituted phenols and nitrophenol pesticide are more rapidly destroyed with BDD than with PbO 2 using small conventional electrolytic cells [36].…”
Section: Decay Kinetics Of Dichlorobenzenementioning
confidence: 98%
“…As pointed out by Kapalka et al [16], BDD is an ideal anode material for the mineralization of organics; thus, it is being widely used nowadays in direct electrooxidation [10,[17][18][19][20] and in combined treatment methods such as electro-Fenton [21][22][23], solar electro-Fenton [22], or sonoelectrochemical [24], as well as in the electrochemical detection [25][26][27], of distinct classes of organic substances. High mineralization rates and current efficiencies are attained with BDD anodes due to properties such as large electrochemical window and good corrosion stability [28], as well as the presence of quasi-free hydroxyl radicals on their surfaces [16,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest adsorption's strength of •OH radicals on each electrode surface (adsorption enthalpy) the lower oxidizing power (Kapałka et al, 2009). Even though, the BDD electrodes are well known by their high oxidizing power (Alfaro et al, 2006;Kapałka et al, 2009Kapałka et al, , 2008, the presence of chloride species can slow down the electrodes performance in the EOCs degradation, and therefore the indirect oxidation by active chlorine species may not occur (Anglada et al, 2009;Mascia et al, 2007;Pereira et al, 2015;Scialdone et al, 2009).…”
Section: Electrochemical Batch Reactor (Ebr): Degradation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%