2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-01002-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical calcareous deposition in seawater. A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
42
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on such comparison, all carbon steel samples submitted to both GCP and ICCP were within the water reduction potential domain on steel, marked by potentials lower than –0.96 V (Ag/AgCl sat ). Despite the possibility of H 2 (g) formation for all samples under cathodic protection, the deposition of aragonite is only expected for samples under potentials lower than –1.06 V (Ag/AgCl sat ) 9, which is the case for the samples protected by impressed current.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Based on such comparison, all carbon steel samples submitted to both GCP and ICCP were within the water reduction potential domain on steel, marked by potentials lower than –0.96 V (Ag/AgCl sat ). Despite the possibility of H 2 (g) formation for all samples under cathodic protection, the deposition of aragonite is only expected for samples under potentials lower than –1.06 V (Ag/AgCl sat ) 9, which is the case for the samples protected by impressed current.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Differently from samples subjected to other forms of cathodic protection, these structures were identified on IC‐uncoated samples subjected to 60 days of immersion and beyond. The literature already predicted the presence of brucite and aragonite under potentials less negative than –1.06 V (Ag/AgCl sat ), as the potential applied on ICCP samples, since it allows greater local pH values and, consequently, Mg(OH) 2 deposition 9. On the other hand, the inhibition of calcite formation was also expected due to the low Ca/Mg mass ratio in seawater and the lower potentials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations